HIGHLA-L Digest - 8 Aug 2006 to 9 Aug 2006 (#2006-126)

      HIGHLA-L automatic digest system (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:00:11 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: HIGHLA-L automatic digest system: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 9 Aug 2006 to 10 Aug 2006 (#2006-127)"
      • Previous message: HIGHLA-L automatic digest system: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 5 Aug 2006 to 8 Aug 2006 (#2006-125)"

      --------
      There are 4 messages totalling 155 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Living UnGracefully, Until Someone Catches Up With Him (4)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:05:53 EDT
      From:    Dotiran@aol.com
      Subject: Re: Living UnGracefully, Until Someone Catches Up With Him
      
       
      In a message dated 8/8/2006 8:07:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time,  
      eheinr007@comcast.net writes:
      
      Barbecued Jesus,
      
      
       
       
      Is the blasphemy necessary?
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:06:01 +0100
      From:    Jette Goldie <jette@blueyonder.co.uk>
      Subject: Re: Living UnGracefully, Until Someone Catches Up With Him
      
      >
      > In a message dated 8/8/2006 8:07:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
      > eheinr007@comcast.net writes:
      >
      > Barbecued Jesus,
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Is the blasphemy necessary?
      >
      >
      
      The spammer's apparent name was Jesus - (I assume pronounced "heesoos"?),
      so was it necessarily blasphemy?
      
      Jette
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:04:17 -0400
      From:    Wendy <Immortals_Incorporated@cox.net>
      Subject: Re: Living UnGracefully, Until Someone Catches Up With Him
      
       Earl joked:
      > Barbecued Jesus,
       
      Rottie sees no humor:
      > Is the blasphemy necessary?
      
       A. "Jesus" is a name. Just a name. Jesus may be cutting your grass or
      picking apples for your table at this very moment. The fact that it is
      not a common WASP name does not mean it isn't considered perfectly
      normal in other cultures.
      
      B. Blasphemy is in the eyes and ears of the Faithful.  Saying "Jesus
      F#@king Christ" might be crude or insensitive but unless I've signed on
      to your religion, it's not blasphemous.  And if I *were* a believer
      *and* happened to believe in the same flavor of religion that you did,
      your recourse would be to read me out in front of our mutual
      congregation, not in a public venue filled with all manner of believers
      and nonbelievers.
      
      C. As a citizen of a once, and hopefully future, free country, I have a
      right to say almost any damn thing I want without being hauled up on
      blasphemy charges (Joseph Burstyn, Inc v Wilson 1952). Assuming Earl
      resides in the USA as well, he can barbecue Jesus until the cows come
      home. (The cows will thank him, I'm sure.)
      
      Now, shouldn't we be discussing "The Source"?
      
      Wendy (Holy Mother of Vishnu!)
      
      Immortals Inc.
      immortals_incorporated@cox.net
      "Weasels for Eternity" 
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:50:12 -0400
      From:    kageorge <kageorge1@verizon.net>
      Subject: Re: Living UnGracefully, Until Someone Catches Up With Him
      
      Wendy and I are in 1000% agreement on this.  Jeez.  (Oh, is that 
      blasphemous?? Sooooo sorry.  NOT)
      
      What may be blasphemous in one culture can be sacred in another.  If you 
      want to live in a free society, accept it. 
      
      No, do more than accept it.  Nurture it, relish it, see it as the great 
      strength that it is.
      
      MacG
      
      Wendy wrote:
      
      > Earl joked:
      >  
      >
      >>Barbecued Jesus,
      >>    
      >>
      > 
      >Rottie sees no humor:
      >  
      >
      >>Is the blasphemy necessary?
      >>    
      >>
      >
      > A. "Jesus" is a name. Just a name. Jesus may be cutting your grass or
      >picking apples for your table at this very moment. The fact that it is
      >not a common WASP name does not mean it isn't considered perfectly
      >normal in other cultures.
      >
      >B. Blasphemy is in the eyes and ears of the Faithful.  Saying "Jesus
      >F#@king Christ" might be crude or insensitive but unless I've signed on
      >to your religion, it's not blasphemous.  And if I *were* a believer
      >*and* happened to believe in the same flavor of religion that you did,
      >your recourse would be to read me out in front of our mutual
      >congregation, not in a public venue filled with all manner of believers
      >and nonbelievers.
      >
      >C. As a citizen of a once, and hopefully future, free country, I have a
      >right to say almost any damn thing I want without being hauled up on
      >blasphemy charges (Joseph Burstyn, Inc v Wilson 1952). Assuming Earl
      >resides in the USA as well, he can barbecue Jesus until the cows come
      >home. (The cows will thank him, I'm sure.)
      >
      >Now, shouldn't we be discussing "The Source"?
      >
      >Wendy (Holy Mother of Vishnu!)
      >
      >Immortals Inc.
      >immortals_incorporated@cox.net
      >"Weasels for Eternity" 
      >
      >  
      >
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 8 Aug 2006 to 9 Aug 2006 (#2006-126)
      *************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: HIGHLA-L automatic digest system: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 9 Aug 2006 to 10 Aug 2006 (#2006-127)"
      • Previous message: HIGHLA-L automatic digest system: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 5 Aug 2006 to 8 Aug 2006 (#2006-125)"