HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jan 2004 (#2004-12)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:00:01 -0500

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jan 2004 to 11 Jan 2004 (#2004-13)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 9 Jan 2004 to 10 Jan 2004 - Special issue (#2004-11)"

      --------
      There are 4 messages totalling 142 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Deep Impacting (2)
        2. Endgame Version Question (2)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:46:24 -0800
      From:    "R. Shelton" <rshelton2@earthlink.net>
      Subject: Re: Deep Impacting
      
      At 9:35 AM -1000 1/10/04, MacWestie wrote:
      >there--unlike Impact which has AP on the cover but no place else.
      
      And. . . .you know this how???
      
      I'm pretty sure you said you hadn't read the article; it isn't even
      out yet, is it, John?
      
      If so, that makes this statement completely false! (not to mention
      flaming) What's up with that?
      
      I've got plenty of copies of past Impact Mags w/good AP and/or HL articles.
      
      --
      Rachel A. Shelton
      rshelton2@earthlink.net
           @}->->->-
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:26:36 -0000
      From:    "a.j.mosby" <a.j.mosby@btinternet.com>
      Subject: Endgame Version Question
      
      I've just watched Endgame on BBC1. Mainly out of interest to see which
      version they were using. But I'm slightly confuzzled.Without me rummaging
      through my DVD piles...
      
      Did the DVD version of Endgame have:
      
      a) the Methos line about liberating the sword from Lost and Found
      
      b) the later scene where Joe kills the Renegade Watcher/sniper at the
      Duncan/Connor fight?
      
      c) The moprhing face between Connor and Duncan
      
      d) the 'Kate lives' finale
      
      
      This BBC1 version has them *all* and my memory suggests some of these scenes
      appeared in different versions than each other. It just seems to flow  a
      little better (not ideally by any means, but better)
      
      John
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:24:30 -1000
      From:    MacWestie <mac.westie@verizon.net>
      Subject: Re: Deep Impacting
      
      me before--
      > And, I hope that the GOH she touts as coming will actually BE
      > > there--unlike Impact which has AP on the cover but no place else.
      
      John--
      > Actually I can't let that crack pass. He *is* in the magazine and the
      > article itself and a competition therein as advertised. ...
      > You are not entitled to post outright lies - even through ignorance.
      
      All I can do is go by what YOU tell us, John, as you grudgingly parcel out
      info to the list.  You have mentioned in recent posts the various people
      interviewed in this issue; AP is not on your list, so I have to assume you
      have no new comments from him.  (If AP _were_ one of your interviewees,
      surely you'd have been touting THAT from the start.)  You have also posted
      the mini-series will feature a bunch of new people, w/ AP not currently set
      to appear.
      
      Perhaps you included some more ancient photos of AP in the article, &
      perhaps your interviewees mention Duncan occasionally, but that is NOT the
      same as an "appearance" by AP in the issue.  As a mag buyer, seeing AP's
      photo on a cover makes me expect to see an interview of HIM or info on an
      upcoming project of HIS.  Of course, experience has taught me to check
      inside carefully to be sure the cover isn't just a marketing ploy.
      
      
      >If you
      > do so again I will formally ask Debbie to take action.
      
      Well,  you just indulged in some nasty--& unfounded--language above that
      amounts to name-calling.  But maybe you feel better for it--don't worry, it
      doesn't bother me & I certainly won't report you.
      
      John, the natives/list members are getting restless right on cue--not that's
      there's anything ELSE to talk about in HL-land.  But, particularly if your
      blood pressure is at risk, perhaps we should agree to disagree (however
      vehemently)?  Your call.
      
      Nina (a chance to win a katana--ooooooh, how exciting...)
      mac.westie@verizon.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:42:41 EST
      From:    Dotiran@aol.com
      Subject: Re: Endgame Version Question
      
      In a message dated 1/10/2004 7:27:07 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
      a.j.mosby@btinternet.com writes:
      
      > a) the Methos line about liberating the sword from Lost and Found
      
      
      yes. And so did the theater/movie version
      
      >
      > b) the later scene where Joe kills the Renegade Watcher/sniper at the
      > Duncan/Connor fight?
      >
      
      
      no, but the alternate version on the DVD had it
      
      > c) The moprhing face between Connor and Duncan
      
      
      yes. blech
      
      >
      > d) the 'Kate lives' finale
      >
      
      both alternate versions had that but not the movie version
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jan 2004 (#2004-12)
      ***********************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jan 2004 to 11 Jan 2004 (#2004-13)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 9 Jan 2004 to 10 Jan 2004 - Special issue (#2004-11)"