HIGHLA-L Digest - 1 Sep 2003 to 2 Sep 2003 (#2003-207)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:00:01 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 2 Sep 2003 to 9 Sep 2003 (#2003-208)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 31 Aug 2003 to 1 Sep 2003 (#2003-206)"

      --------
      There are 5 messages totalling 463 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Suede nails and poll calls (or something)/Seacouver RepCo (2)
        2. Newspaper Article-Elizabeth Gracen stalked
        3. Bi-Monthly Reminder
        4. HNR Interview with Peter is up w/pics!
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 1 Sep 2003 22:28:24 -0700
      From:    Gregory Mate <gmate@rogers.com>
      Subject: Re: Suede nails and poll calls (or something)/Seacouver RepCo
      
      >It doesn't take strength of character to be an ER doc?  ::::
      >raised eyebrows ::::  I take it you don't know many ER/trauma
      >personnel <g>.
      
      I do know a few, actually, and I never made that generalization, nor did I
      ever question the good doctor's strength of character.  I simply felt that
      Tessa was a stronger person than Anne.  Perhaps I was vague, so let me
      explain my position.
      
      Zk:
      
       > Anne, otoh, apparently decided early enough in life to be a doctor that
      she put off having much of a social life (which I blame for the awkwardness
      as well as the wardrobe), and was strongly motivated to do so.  I think
      you'd have to be, to go through that many years of
      school/internship/residency.  ER Docs, esp. starting out, often have
      horrendous six-figure school loans, and their income is relatively low, so
      she obviously wasn't in it for the money.  She truly cared about people and
      when she was in
      Doctor mode, she became oblivious to everything
      <snip>
      
      I've known a number of people who chose the medical profession yet did not
      have the social awkwardness of Dr. Anne.  Motivation is needed, certainly,
      but social ineptitude cannot simply be blamed on one's career choice.  And
      there are many people in various social and medical fields who truly care
      about people, yet can still find time for relationships.  Admittedly some
      cannot, or choose not to.  I saw Anne as socially awkward to begin with,
      and didn't have a chance to be a "late bloomer" due to her total commitment
      to healing people.  <Side note:  Gregor was for his time the same thing as
      Anne was to her time.  His care and feeling for his patients, while I'm
      sure was as genuine as Anne's, disappeared because he lacked the strength
      of character to realize that (a) you cannot save everyone and (b) just
      because mortals will eventually die does not mean the healer's job is in
      vain).>
      
      >We saw Tessa in some tense situations, either watching Duncan go
      >off to war, or facing Grayson, or when she was kidnapped in The
      >Darkness.  But she had a firm, long-term, relatively untroubled
      >relationship with Duncan for many years, and she owned an antique
      >store, with all of its challenges (maybe negotiating the Escher
      >Antique Store was enough).
      
      While I admitted that Tessa was "eased" into the world of Immortals (and
      Anne was not, so Tessa had the situational advantage there), Tessa was also
      suddenly dropped into the darker side of Immortals with the meeting of
      Slan.  She was able to face Grayson.  She was able to leave a discernible
      trail when kidnapped by Caleb.  By doing so she demonstrated the ability to
      adapt to unfamiliar situations and to be able to think quickly.  As an ER
      doctor, Anne would also have to think quickly in order to save a patient's
      life; however, she was able to rely on years of training and experience to
      do so.  Tessa did not have such experience and training to guide her in her
      ordeals with evil Immortals.  While Tessa may not have had the caring heart
      (at least not on the same level) and the same sort of intelligence as Anne,
      Tessa demonstrated the ability to be able to take in sensory overload and
      novel situations and deal with them more effectively, IMO, that Anne.  If
      you recall, Brenda from HL1 was thrust into the world of Immortals much the
      same as was Anne, and she still stayed with Connor (until she died in a car
      accident if you believe the events of the 2nd HL movie as gospel).  I hope
      that explains my reasoning.
      
      Zk again:
      >Character?  I think so.
      No question about it, and probably more than many of Duncan's love
      interests (at least what little was presented of them on screen).
      
      >Having enjoyed Duncan's libido for many years, I doubt if she'd
      >disapprove <g>.
      
      Heh.  Probably just smile and shake her head.  "Oh that scampish Scotsman
      is at it again!"
      
      >I think that comparing Amanda with anything is definitely
      >comparing apples and kumquats.  Except that they were both tall
      >and thin, they had little in common.  If Amanda had been a man,
      >Duncan would have whacked her in 1650.
      
      ::::looks innocently:::: But I thought he *did* whack her on many an
      occasion (prolly got the "Double Quickening" when he first met her and
      Rebecca in 1639).
      
      
      ....Greg....
      gmate@rogers.com
      He Who Would Take Nails Over Felicia Martins Any Day
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 1 Sep 2003 21:08:03 -0700
      From:    FKMel <sgt_buck_frobisher@yahoo.com>
      Subject: Re: Suede nails and poll calls (or something)/Seacouver RepCo
      
      .  If
      > you recall, Brenda from HL1 was thrust into the
      > world of Immortals much the same as was Anne, and
      she still stayed with Connor (until she died in a car
      > accident if you believe the events of the 2nd HL
      > movie as gospel).  I hope that explains my
      reasoning.
      
      That was in the third movie. Or are you saying second
      because you do what I do and deny the second films
      existence? That makes sense.
      >
      > ::::looks innocently:::: But I thought he *did*
      > whack her on many an occasion (prolly got the
      "Double Quickening" when he first met her and
      Rebecca in 1639).
      >
      > <ggl> I bet he did, too.
      
      Mel(at least the car accident storyline was better
      than the radiation poisoning one in that piece of junk
      they called HL 2 (what HL2? Never was made as far as
      I'm concerned.))
      
      =====
      The trouble with immortality is that it tends to go on forever-Herb Cain
      FK:NickNatPacker, Knight of the Cross,Knightie, Natpacker/Highlander:Duncan Flag-Waver/Due South Fan/Tracker Fan/Angel Fan/Port Charles Fan
      
      __________________________________
      Do you Yahoo!?
      Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
      http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 1 Sep 2003 21:52:43 -0700
      From:    FKMel <sgt_buck_frobisher@yahoo.com>
      Subject: Newspaper Article-Elizabeth Gracen stalked
      
      I really hope I'm not pulling a no no by posting this
      link...don't really think it is, though. It was
      orignally posted to one of the Yahoo lists, and the
      link here is to the article as posted to Holyground
      forum (the newspaper itself you have to subscribe to
      and register).
      
      http://www.holygroundforum.net/cgi-bin/forum/forum.cgi?read=105455
      
      Like I said, I hope I didn't break a rule...I know
      some lists just stick to the actors' work and
      stuff....but if I did, sorry.
      
      Mel, who tends to get nervous, maybe a little overly
      so, about getting in trouble on lists due to a nasty
      incident a while back in another fandom
      
      =====
      The trouble with immortality is that it tends to go on forever-Herb Cain
      FK:NickNatPacker, Knight of the Cross,Knightie, Natpacker/Highlander:Duncan Flag-Waver/Due South Fan/Tracker Fan/Angel Fan/Port Charles Fan
      
      __________________________________
      Do you Yahoo!?
      Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
      http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 1 Sep 2003 23:50:02 -0500
      From:    Debra Douglass <ddoug@catrio.org>
      Subject: Bi-Monthly Reminder
      
                (updated 8/1/00)    HIGHLA-L Bi-Monthly Reminders
      
      The address to send your LISTSERV commands to is
      LISTSERV@LISTS.PSU.EDU. The listowner can be contacted at
      ddoug@CATRIO.ORG
      
      If your posts to HIGHLA-L are being "submitted to the moderator of the
      HIGHLA-L list" please check out the section below titled "WHAT TO DO
      IF THE LISTSERV SAYS YOU ARE NOT SUBSCRIBED TO HIGHLA-L:"
      
      -----
      All of you received the Membership Rules when you first subscribed to
      this list so I'm not going to repeat them here but I will hit a few
      high points. Also included is a few LISTSERV commands to change your
      subscription to this list.
      
        No Flaming Is Allowed. (see note)
        We have strict Spoiler Rules for the current first-run season.
          Please don't post a message about any current season episode until
          after you have read the Welcome message (this contains all the
          rules).
        This is a -private- mailing list. Do not forward information posted
          on this mailing list without the -original- author's permission.
      
        ALL ADS listing items for SALE, no matter how minor, MUST be cleared
        through the list owner FIRST.
      
      
      NOTE:
        Flaming: adj. (possible origin: Webster's 3.intensely emotional;
        ardent; passionate) Usage on Internet: intensely emotional and very
        derogatory remarks about an individual, a group, or a dearly held
        belief system (religious beliefs, politics, sexual orientation,
        certain TV series, etc.).  To insult, treat with scorn or great
        disrespect.
        Flame remarks are usually empty of any actual facts, just
        emotionally charged opinions and sometimes obscenities.
      
        Flame-bait: derivative of Flaming (see above). Any remark, which in
        itself does not qualify as a Flame, but because of trigger words,
        irritating adjectives or phrases (usually used in a rude manner) is
        almost always guaranteed to elicit Flames from people who read the
        message.
      END NOTE
      
      BUT REMEMBER:
                Disagreements make for lively debate,
                and lively debate is what keeps this list
                           INTERESTING!!!
      
      
      Do NOT send any 'public service announcements' unless they are related
      to Highlander. BTW if you receive a  computer virus report check it
      against <http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html> before passing it
      on.
      
                ********************************************
                HOAXES, VIRUS WARNINGS, SPAM OF ANY TYPE,
                INCLUDING SALES, CHAIN LETTERS AND DONATION
                REQUESTS, WILL NOT BE TOLERATED ON
                HIGHLA-L or HLFIC-L.
                ********************************************
      
      Do NOT post 'test' messages. If you aren't receiving mail from the
      list, send email to ME and I'll look into it.
      
      To send a message to the group, simply address it to
      HIGHLA-L@LISTS.psu.edu. Also, you should be able to reply to any
      message from the list as you would normally reply to a message from a
      single person.
      
      If your messages are not being posted to the LIST, check to make sure
      that you are NOT including the message headers from any message that
      you might be replying to. A message that contains (in the body of the
      message) any unaltered email header that includes the address
      of the list will be bounce to the errors queue.
      
      <<Sender:       HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU (Highlander movies and TV series)
      <<Reply-to:     HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU (Highlander movies and TV series)
      <<To:   HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU (Multiple recipients of list HIGHLA-L)
      
      The reason that these didn't blow up this message is because I
      preceded them with '<<' on each line.
      
      As LIST-owner, I reserve the right to remove anyone from the list who
      violates the rules (they are in the Welcome message that you will
      receive when you subscribe).
      
                          USEFUL LISTSERV COMMANDS
      
      To change your subscription options to stop receiving the list of a
      period of time (i.e. for a vacation or finals week): send mail to
      LISTSERV@LISTS.psu.edu with only the following line in the body of the
      message (the Subject line is ignored):
      
       SET HIGHLA-L NOMAIL
      
      To change (or to reset) your subscription options to receive the list
      as separate email messages (default): send mail to
      LISTSERV@LISTS.psu.edu with only the following line in the body of the
      message (the Subject line is ignored):
      
       SET HIGHLA-L MAIL
      
      To change your subscription options to receive the list in a daily
      digest: send mail to LISTSERV@LISTS.psu.edu with only the following
      line in the body of the message (the Subject line is ignored):
      
       SET HIGHLA-L DIGEST
      
      To change your subscription options to receive the list as short
      indexes of all postings (you can then retrieve the messages that you
      are interested in reading): send mail to LISTSERV@LISTS.psu.edu with
      only the following line in the body of the message (the Subject line
      is ignored):
      
      SET HIGHLA-L INDEX
      
      If you want a prefix to show up on your subject lines to help identify
      which message come from HIGHLA-L then send email to
      LISTSERV@LISTS.psu.edu with only the following line in the body of the
      message (Subject line is ignored):
      
      SET HIGHLA-L SUBJ
      
      The prefix  [HL] will appear at the beginning of each Subject line of
      all new messages from HIGHLA-L (The string 'Re:' will appear before
      the prefix on replies).
      
      
      If your mailer does not provide the mailing address of the person who
      sent a post (usually PC and Mac mailers) you might want to change your
      subscription option to get the headers also placed in the body of the
      message. To do this: send mail to LISTSERV@LISTS.psu.edu with only the
      following line in the body of the message (the Subject line is
      ignored):
      
      SET HIGHLA-L DUALhdr
      
      Be careful and edit these headers out of any reply because they may
      cause problems when you try to post the reply (the LISTSERV software
      may fail to post your message).
      
      To Unsubscribe: send mail to LISTSERV@LISTS.psu.edu with only the
      following line in the body of the message (the Subject line is
      ignored):
      
       SIGNOFF HIGHLA-L
      
      Note: DO NOT send mail to HIGHLA-L@LISTS.psu.edu to unsubscribe.
      
      It may seem that your SIGNOFF didn't take effect because you are still
      getting posts.  There is probably a backlog of messages in HIGHLA-L's
      queue that were posted before you sent the SIGNOFF command. Those will
      continue to come until it gets to the timestamp when you unsubscribed.
      This can take several hours or might even take up to 24 depending on
      how backed up everything is.
      
      
      *WHAT TO DO IF THE LISTSERV SAYS YOU ARE NOT SUBSCRIBED TO HIGHLA-L:
      
        When trying to send one of these commands if you receive back a
        message saying that you are not subscribed to HIGHLA-L this means
        that your current outgoing email address has changed since you
        subscribed to the list. It is very common for system administrators
        to do this without notifying their users. The way to straighten this
        out is to SUBSCRIBE from your new address and SIGNOFF from the
        old. If you can't SIGNOFF from the old address please notify me and
        I'll remove it.
      
        If you post a message to the list and then receive a message stating
        that your message has been forwarded to the moderator (me) that is
        another indication that your outgoing email address has changed. I
        will forward your message to the list if I can determine that you
        are currently subscribed under any address (if the message doesn't
        violate any of the Rules). Send me email and we will straighten it
        out so that you can post unrestricted again.
      
      
      SPECIAL: To request a copy of the Highlander FAQ list (Frequently
      Asked Questions and the answers) send an email message to me at
      ddoug@CATRIO.ORG with 'Send HL FAQ' in the Subject and
      the FAQ will be sent to you automatically in nineteen parts. Collect
      the contents of the numbered messages sequentially in a file for the
      complete FAQ. Beware: the total FAQ is currently 273k. To check the
      latest version number, send me email with 'Query HL FAQ' in the
      Subject line.
      
      I have other files that you can retrieve by automatic mail request.
      
      If you send one of the following string (only one request per message)
      in the Subject line of a message to ddoug@CATRIO.ORG
      you will receive the following files by automatic mail request.
      
      'Send HLFIC Instruct'        =  Instructions for retrieving
                                      stories from the LISTSERV
                                      (most recent 2 months only; the
                                      rest are available by ftp from
                                      ftp.highlander.org)
      'Send HL Intro'              =  Introduction to HIGHLA-L and
                                      subscription instructions
      'Send Sword FAQ'             =  The Sword FAQ from
                                      rec.martial-arts (22 March, 1994)
      'Send HL FAQ'                =  The Highlander FAQ in 19 parts
                                      (each part 350 lines or less)
      'Send HL mFAQ'               =  The Highlander FAQ in 25 parts
                                      (each part 250 lines or less)
      
      Also we have a World Wide Web and an ftp site:
         WWW -> http://www.highlander.org/highlander/
         FTP -> ftp.highlander.org - /pub/highlander   or
         FTP -> 198.87.195.20 - /pub/highlander
      
      The latest version of the FAQ is always available through me. The Web
      and FTP sites may have older versions. The copy on Highlander.ORG is updated
      every two to three months (more frequently if necessary) and I have no
      control as to when any other Web site updates their version.
      
      Davis/Panzer Productions their their own WWW site which
      contains information about the TV series, the movies, and available
      Highlander merchandise.
      
         http://www.highlander-official.com/highland/
      
      Rysher Entertainment also maintains a Highlander site about the TV
      series.
      
         http://www.rysher.com/highlander/
      
      -Debbie Douglass
      (HIGHLA-L list owner)
      --
      .------------------------------------------------------------------.
      |   No flames were thrown in the creation of this email message.   |
      |-----------------------------.------------------------------------'
      |Debra Douglass                \
      |ddoug@catrio.org               \
      |http://www.catrio.org           \
      `---------------------------------`
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 2 Sep 2003 08:36:48 -0400
      From:    Pgannon <pgannon@optonline.net>
      Subject: Re: HNR Interview with Peter is up w/pics!
      
      Nice interview from a really nice guy!  Thanks for the heads-up!
      Peggie  ;-P
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "TCBO2" <TCBO2@comcast.net>
      To: <HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU>
      Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:00 PM
      Subject: HNR Interview with Peter is up w/pics!
      
      
      > Please see the lovely spread Peter has been given at:
      >
      > http://www.hollywoodnorthreport.com/
      >
      > Peter was contacted and agreed to be interviewed by the
      > Hollywood North Report's Mark & interviewer Frank Garcia
      > after I contacted them initially on July 14th.  Nine emails
      > later, Peter, Mark, and Frank met ... and we had this really
      > interesting and seriously intelligent interview.  You should
      > know that although the interview could use a little "beta-ing"
      > the website's content is routinely scanned by show business
      > PTB in both Canada and Hollywood because of its ability to
      > get information and articles posted before the rest of the
      > pack - and in a respectful, intelligent manner.  This can only
      > be another little publicity "assist" for Peter's career.
      >
      > This was the latest in an ongoing 8-year series of PW support
      > campaigns of the Unofficial Peter Wingfield Appreciation Guild
      > (UPWAG).  Yes, we're still alive, well, and functioning merrily!  :)
      >
      > I'd be very grateful if all of you who can take a moment, would
      > send an email of appreciation to both of them at:
      > Mark:  mark@hollywoodnorthreport.com
      > Frank: frank@hollywoodnorthreport.com
      >
      >
      > TCBO2
      >
      > UPWAG
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 1 Sep 2003 to 2 Sep 2003 (#2003-207)
      *************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 2 Sep 2003 to 9 Sep 2003 (#2003-208)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 31 Aug 2003 to 1 Sep 2003 (#2003-206)"