HIGHLA-L Digest - 25 Jan 2003 to 27 Jan 2003 (#2003-11)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:00:01 -0500

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 27 Jan 2003 to 28 Jan 2003 (#2003-12)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 24 Jan 2003 to 25 Jan 2003 (#2003-10)"

      --------
      There are 5 messages totalling 145 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Tracker Promos (5)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:54:48 -0500
      From:    Sandy Fields <diamonique@comcast.net>
      Subject: Tracker Promos
      
      I was watching Stargate SG1 Friday night, and I swear they aired at least 3
      promos for Tracker... maybe 4!!
      
      Gee... maybe it wouldn't have been such a bad idea for HL to have been on
      SciFi after all.
      
      -- Sandy
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:05:43 -0500
      From:    Bizarro7@aol.com
      Subject: Re: Tracker Promos
      
      In a message dated 1/27/2003 3:54:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, diamonique@comcast.net writes:
      
      > I was watching Stargate SG1 Friday night, and I swear they aired at least 3
      > promos for Tracker... maybe 4!!
      >
      > Gee... maybe it wouldn't have been such a bad idea for HL
      > to have been on
      > SciFi after all.
      
      With TRACKER garnering ratings higher than first-run episodes of FARSCAPE, I would be very surprised if they didn't dust off the option to air HL:TS reruns at a good hour in the evening. Tracker was meant to be a filler until the new TREMORS series finishes its tardy special effects. I don't think they were expecting it to do so well, and I'm betting Bonnie Hammer is paying attention.
      
      Leah
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:12:26 -0800
      From:    Jen <Data@cyberg8t.com>
      Subject: Re: Tracker Promos
      
      Nah, Bonnie Hammer pays attention to nothing. I have no faith in that woman
      or in a network that makes false promises or makes it look like that there
      is really a chance that a series will happen, when the network really has no
      interest in doing "anymore space shows" when that is what a lot of scifi is,
      and NOT silly Dream readers. *rolls her eyes*  Rant for the day. :-D Yay!
      
      
      Jen
      
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: <Bizarro7@aol.com>
      To: <HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU>
      Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:05 PM
      Subject: Re: Tracker Promos
      
      
      > In a message dated 1/27/2003 3:54:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
      diamonique@comcast.net writes:
      >
      > > I was watching Stargate SG1 Friday night, and I swear they aired at
      least 3
      > > promos for Tracker... maybe 4!!
      > >
      > > Gee... maybe it wouldn't have been such a bad idea for HL
      > > to have been on
      > > SciFi after all.
      >
      > With TRACKER garnering ratings higher than first-run episodes of FARSCAPE,
      I would be very surprised if they didn't dust off the option to air HL:TS
      reruns at a good hour in the evening. Tracker was meant to be a filler until
      the new TREMORS series finishes its tardy special effects. I don't think
      they were expecting it to do so well, and I'm betting Bonnie Hammer is
      paying attention.
      >
      > Leah
      >
      >
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 27 Jan 2003 17:32:15 -0800
      From:    Lynn <lloschin@sprynet.com>
      Subject: Re: Tracker Promos
      
      From: <Bizarro7@aol.com>
      
      > With TRACKER garnering ratings higher than first-run episodes of FARSCAPE,
      I would be very
      > surprised if they didn't dust off the option to air HL:TS reruns at a good
      hour in the evening.
      
      According to Bill Panzer, Sci-Fi's license expired quite awhile ago.  They'd
      have to enter into a new deal with Paramount, which inherited Rysher's
      domestic distribution rights.  It's certainly possible they could do it if
      they were interested enough, though.
      
      Lynn
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:02:13 -0500
      From:    virginia foster <vfoster@mindspring.com>
      Subject: Re: Tracker Promos
      
      At 04:05 PM 01/27/03 -0500, Leah wrote:
      
      >With TRACKER garnering ratings higher than first-run episodes of FARSCAPE,
      >I would be very surprised if they didn't dust off the option to air HL:TS
      >reruns at a good hour in the evening. Tracker was meant to be a filler
      >until the new TREMORS series finishes its tardy special effects. I don't
      >think they were expecting it to do so well, and I'm betting Bonnie Hammer
      >is paying attention.
      
      You are kidding, right?  Tracker getting higher ratings than Farscape?  Egads.
      How in the world does anything that bad get such good ratings?  Oh wait,
      don't answer that, I tend to forget about reality tv, which is (IMGLO) rather
      bad.
      
      I've tried to watch Tracker, really I have.  Mostly for Geraint Wyn
      Davies.  But
      it's so darned boring and such a rip-off of Starman crossed with Time Trax that
      I can't get though much of it. I'd rather SciFi had bought Time Trax.
      
      
      virginia
      
      vfoster@mindspring.com *@* http://www.mindspring.com/~vfoster/va.html
      ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
      Fandom related items on Ebay: http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/vfoster/
      ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
                  One Ring to rule them all.  One Ring to find them.
              One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 25 Jan 2003 to 27 Jan 2003 (#2003-11)
      **************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 27 Jan 2003 to 28 Jan 2003 (#2003-12)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 24 Jan 2003 to 25 Jan 2003 (#2003-10)"