HIGHLA-L Digest - 7 Nov 2002 to 8 Nov 2002 (#2002-194)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Fri, 8 Nov 2002 22:00:02 -0500

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 8 Nov 2002 to 9 Nov 2002 (#2002-195)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 6 Nov 2002 to 7 Nov 2002 (#2002-193)"

      --------
      There are 2 messages totalling 83 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Doc Anne (wasQs (was-- Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander 5?")) (2)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Fri, 8 Nov 2002 06:33:29 -0500
      From:    Judy Schneider <judyas77@hotmail.com>
      Subject: Re: Doc Anne (wasQs (was-- Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander 5?"))
      
      Oh look!!  My message showed up. And it only took 2 months!!!!
      
      
      Judy, the Chocolate Slayer   judyas77@hotmail.com
        "I never met a chocolate I didn't like"--Deanna Troi
      
      >
      >Elaine wrote:
      >
      ><snip>
      >>
      >Actually, someone else wrote this part, but I lost track of who. 8)
      >
      >> >> Worst of all, probably, she risked herself, the life
      >>of her soon-to-be born child, & the lives of emergency workers <<
      >>
      >>So now she behaves like the professional everyone wants her to be and that
      >>is wrong too, can't win can she.
      >>
      >Sorry, but I _completely_ disagree here. Anne was NOT an emergency worker.
      >She had no business being at the scene in the first place. She _should_
      >have
      >been at the hospital, ready to do HER job, which was treating the wounded
      >that the professional rescue workers were able to safely remove from the
      >scene of the accident. That's even if she wasn't pregnant. Being pregnant
      >made it just so much worse.
      >
      >One of the lines I hated the most about that episode, was when she decided
      >to go into the subway and her friend asked about her baby she said "She'll
      >just have to get used to it." Used to what? Mommy not thinking? Mommy
      >risking her life? Mommy risking _my_ life???? Sorry, but that was just
      >plain
      >criminally stupid. Most parents will risk their own lives for the children,
      >not the opposite.
      >
      >Not to mention the fact that she had been told to stay out by the incident
      >commander, and her actions led directly to the death of her friend.
      >
      >I'm not a Doctor Anne hater, I'm kinda Anne neutral, but in this episode, I
      >wanted to turn her over my knee and give her a spanking!
      >
      >
      >Judy, the Chocolate Slayer   judyas77@hotmail.com
      >  "I never met a chocolate I didn't like"--Deanna Troi
      >
      
      
      _________________________________________________________________
      Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
      http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Fri, 8 Nov 2002 07:24:04 -0600
      From:    Debra Douglass <ddoug@catrio.org>
      Subject: Re: Doc Anne (wasQs (was-- Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander 5?"))
      
      On 11/8/2002, on HIGHLA-L@lists.psu.edu, Judy Schneider wrote:
       >>Oh look!!  My message showed up. And it only took 2 months!!!!
      
      More than likely your ISP's mailserver had your post in its bowels
      all this time and finally delivered it to your mailbox. Everyone else
      (except perhaps other Hotmail subscribers) saw that message back when
      you posted it and didn't see a repeat now.
      
      -Debbie (list owner)
      
      --
      .------------------------------------------------------------------.
      |Debra Douglass          ddoug@catrio.org     http://www.catrio.org|
      `------------------------------------------------------------------'
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 7 Nov 2002 to 8 Nov 2002 (#2002-194)
      *************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 8 Nov 2002 to 9 Nov 2002 (#2002-195)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 6 Nov 2002 to 7 Nov 2002 (#2002-193)"