HIGHLA-L Digest - 8 Sep 2002 (#2002-139)
Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
Sun, 8 Sep 2002 22:00:01 -0400
There are 4 messages totalling 115 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. Doc Anne (wasQs (was-- Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander
5?"))
2. Doc Anne (wasQs (was-- Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander 5?"))
3. (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
4. PW in Vancouver video
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 19:12:21 +0100
From: Jette Goldie <jette@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Doc Anne (wasQs (was-- Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander
5?"))
> >> Let's see--Anne violated her lover's privacy by seeking out his medical
> records w/o permission. <<
>
> Okay it was unprofessional - but the man you have just started seeing you
> are really interested in him and then you start to realise there is
> something odd about him, no I don't think she did anything most of us
> wouldn't do in the same situation.
>
Uh, Elaine? This is a MAJOR no-no to a doctor - it's
not quite in the same league as asking his mates
about him.
> >> She also prescribed sleeping pills to said
> lover--despite NOT being his doctor, <<
>
> At that point she was dealing with him as a lover and friend. How often
> have you given someone asprin or any other bit of medicine without knowing
> if they have an allergy - I know I have.
>
NOT a whole bottle of sleeping pills - WAY more
dangerous than a couple of aspirins - as a doctor
should know.
Jette
(aka Vinyaduriel)
"Work for Peace and remain fiercely loving" - Jim Byrnes
jette@blueyonder.co.uk
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
http://bosslady.tripod.com/fanfic.html
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 14:41:50 -0400
From: Sandy Fields <diamonique@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Doc Anne (wasQs (was-- Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander 5?"))
At 02:12 PM 09/08/02, Jette Goldie wrote:
>Uh, Elaine? This is a MAJOR no-no to a doctor - it's not quite in the
>same league as asking his mates about him.
I agree, Jette. It was unprofessional for her to try and look up his
medical records. It is a major no-no, as you said. But for some reason I
just don't give her bad marks for this one... at least not as bad as some
of the other things she did.
>NOT a whole bottle of sleeping pills - WAY more dangerous than a couple of
>aspirins - as a doctor should know.
OK.. I take back what I said about this earlier. I forgot it was a *whole
bottle* of pills. Definitely a no-no. Totally unprofessional, and
something that I don't think a doctor would do. Hand him a couple of pills
maybe, but give him a whole bottle? No.
-- Sandy
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:00:03 -0400
From: KLZ3 <KZIMMERMAN3@cox.net>
Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
> I remember seeing that press release about the Sci-Fi Channel 'not wanting
> anymore space shows' with some bemusement. This would explain why they've
> hardly used the Stargate itself this season, on the show of the same name.
> It's been mostly Earthbound intrigue, something the writers deny upon
> question.
So..they gave up a unique concept of space travel without those
annoying space ships, a concept that could be applied to current
times rather than in the future, for a sekrit, all-powerful,
deadly, deceitful organization funded by who-knows-who, who keep
tabs on the members of the SGC. Sound familiar? Yup, makes lots
of sense to me. Sheesh.
What's next, flying immortals?
~grumpierthanusual (where should I send the canned ferret?)
kzimmerman3@cox.net
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 19:20:31 EDT
From: Highlandmg@aol.com
Subject: Re: PW in Vancouver video
hi
I am going to Reno.. Can I have a video please..
thanks
Mary
------------------------------
End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 8 Sep 2002 (#2002-139)
***********************************************