HIGHLA-L Digest - 7 Sep 2002 to 8 Sep 2002 - Special issue (#2002-138)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Sun, 8 Sep 2002 12:36:22 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 8 Sep 2002 (#2002-139)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 6 Sep 2002 to 7 Sep 2002 (#2002-137)"

      --------
      There are 16 messages totalling 959 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics in this special issue:
      
        1. PW in Vancouver video
        2. Doc Anne  (wasQs (was--  Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander 5?")) (3)
        3. (OT) Another one bites the dust..... (12)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 12:52:13 +1000
      From:    Sonja van den Ende <sonjav@powerup.com.au>
      Subject: PW in Vancouver video
      
      Hi all,
      Highlander DownUnder is pleased to announce the release of another HLDU
      video production.
      
      "A Conversation With Peter Wingfield in Vancouver"
      Peter Wingfield & Carmel Macpherson discuss 2 of Methos' most famous scenes
      right where they took place!  Filmed on location at Spyglass Place (Jimmy
      scene) & Livingstone Park (Alexa's bench)
      Duration: 30minutes.  Cost: $20USD in the USA & Europe, $20AUD in
      Australia, others on enquiry. All prices include postage.
      
      SALES AT RENO: Orders are being taken for delivery at the PWFC Reno
      convention.  If you'd like to guarantee a copy in Reno, let us know & we'll
      make sure it's there for you.  Please pay at the con.
      
      MAIL ORDERS:  Write to me at <sonja@hldu.org>
      
      Check out HLDU's latest, fantastic auction.  There are some great items on
      offer & only 45 hours to
      http://www.carmelmacpherson.com/auc12/auc12-02.htm
      
      cheers,
      Sonja
      
      ************************************************************************
      Sonja van den Ende,  sonja@hldu.org    sonjav@powerup.com.au
      Co-convenor,  Highlander DownUnder: The Official HL Club of Australia
      Our next con:  HLDU5  Brisbane, Australia.  9-11 May 2003
      GOHs: Peter Wingfield (commitments permitting) Others tba
      Visit the HLDU5 site:  http://www.hldu.org/hldu5.htm
      *************************************************************************
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 7 Sep 2002 16:58:04 -1000
      From:    MacWestie <mac.westie@verizon.net>
      Subject: Re: Doc Anne  (wasQs (was--  Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander 5?"))
      
      me before--
      > > True--it was SUPPOSED to be ugly, to reflect the ugliness of who Daimler
      > > was.  That whole ep was ugly.  Doc Anne being unusually (even for her)
      > > bitchy & vacilating all over DM's heart at the end was ugliest of all.
      
      
      ZK--
      > She thought she could, but she couldn't, and she said why.  In
      > context of what she'd seen and been through, it was completely
      > understandable...  Personally, I
      > cut her some slack when she changed  her mind at the end of - um -
      > Mortal Sins?
      
      Maybe I would have, too, except I really disliked the character.
      
      Looking back & w/ the benefit of several discussions on Anne here &
      elsewhere, it really seems to me that she fell far short of what she was
      supposed to be & was both badly written & badly portrayed.  Doc Anne was
      touted as a brilliant professional--a caring & skilled doctor, an
      independent & gorgeous woman--a mortal woman DM could admire & even love.
      BUT, Anne never came close to that.  When DM was w/ Tessa or Amanda
      (completely disparate characters), it was obvious that he cared for them
      deeply & WHY he did so.  When he was w/ Anne, I was constantly going "huh?"
      
      Miniskirts & tight sweaters sabotaged the character--an all-business ER doc.
      Bad hair (unless one LIKES the chipmunk look) went a long way to making Lisa
      Howard look unattractive, compared to how pretty & even sexy she was on
      Earth: Final Conflict, for example.  Anne was ALWAYS cranky about
      something--DM or otherwise--while a winning attitude could have helped
      immensely.  That's where I blame LH in part, as she gave Anne zero charm,
      grace & humor.  DM is a special guy is LOTS of ways, & it strains credulity
      that he'd spend much time enjoying the company of a frumpy grump.
      
      Far more important, however, were the gaffes Doc Anne made professionally.
      Let's see--Anne violated her lover's privacy by seeking out his medical
      records w/o permission.  She also prescribed sleeping pills to said
      lover--despite NOT being his doctor, knowing he hadn't been seen by another
      doctor, & suspecting he was dangerously distraught.  Then, she
      "accidentally" got pregnant; admittedly, that's personal rather than
      professional, but in a DOCTOR & in these circumstances, I find it to be
      overwhelmingly dumb.  Worst of all, probably, she risked herself, the life
      of her soon-to-be born child, & the lives of emergency workers & her
      assistant when she insisted on defying orders & entering the collapsed
      subway; as it happened, her co-worker died due to her stupid decision.  (The
      fact that The Blitz was in season 4, AFTER Mortal Sins, isn't all that
      relevant since her actions in The Blitz were completely in character.)
      
      And, then there's what happened when DM & Anne had to (& that's what it
      looked like to me--like they HAD TO do it, as in a gun to their heads) kiss
      or make love.  Dying fish flopping around in a smelly boat bottom appear to
      be having more fun.  Some people/characters/actors just have no c________.
      
      Nina
      mac.westie@verizon.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 7 Sep 2002 20:19:09 -0700
      From:    Jen <Data@cyberg8t.com>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      Frell frell frell frell frell! *grumbles*  I like that show, too!! Ugh.
      
      Scifi said that they didn't want anymore space shows and it seems that they
      are kicking out the current space shows, too.
      
      *grumbles about how the B5LR series never came into existance and now this*
      
      Grrr....*goes to brood*
      
      Jen
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "John Mosby (B)" <a.j.mosby@btinternet.com>
      To: <HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU>
      Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 5:10 AM
      Subject: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      
      > Sooooooooo.
      >
      > Farscape cancelled. Officially
      >
      > Well.......frell.
      >
      >
      > John
      >
      >
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 00:09:51 -0500
      From:    Basaxl <Basaxl@camalott.com>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      --=======601695E=======
      Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-4D1969EE; charset=us-ascii
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
      
      Where do you keep getting the cancel rumors????- Farscape has been
      officially renewed for its fourth and fifth seasons on the SCI FI Channel,
      making it the longest-running original series in the channel's history.
      SCI FI congratulated Farscape, which earned this year's Saturn Award for
      Best Syndicated/Cable Television Series, and series star Ben Browder, who
      received the Saturn Award for Best Actor on Television.I don't think they
      want to kill a show that has this much going for it.
      NEW EPISODES of Farscape will return in January of 2003, when SEASON FOUR
      continues!   This was taken directly from the SciFi site.
      Basaxl
      
      
      
      
      
      
      >Frell frell frell frell frell! *grumbles*  I like that show, too!! Ugh.
      >
      >Scifi said that they didn't want anymore space shows and it seems that they
      >are kicking out the current space shows, too.
      >
      >*grumbles about how the B5LR series never came into existance and now this*
      >
      >Grrr....*goes to brood*
      >
      >Jen
      >----- Original Message -----
      >From: "John Mosby (B)" <a.j.mosby@btinternet.com>
      >To: <HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU>
      >Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 5:10 AM
      >Subject: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      >
      >
      >> Sooooooooo.
      >>
      >> Farscape cancelled. Officially
      >>
      >> Well.......frell.
      >>
      >>
      >> John
      >>
      >>
      >
      >
      >---
      >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
      >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
      >Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 8/2/02
      >
      
      --=======601695E=======
      Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-avg=cert; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-4D1969EE
      Content-Disposition: inline
      
      
      ---
      Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
      Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
      Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 8/2/02
      
      --=======601695E=======--
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 02:02:59 EDT
      From:    Ashton7@aol.com
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      In a message dated 9/8/02 1:14:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
      Basaxl@camalott.com writes:
      
      << Where do you keep getting the cancel rumors????- Farscape has been
       officially renewed for its fourth and fifth seasons on the SCI FI Channel, >>
      
      SciFi has chosen not to exercise their option for the 5th season. This is
      according to the producer and Ben Browder, who told fans last night:
      
      http://www.farscapeworld.com/news/1031347352.shtml
      
      Apparently they are shooting the last episode and the sets are due to be
      struck next week.
      
      Annie
      
      "Unless the last two years have been a wacky, wacky dream, I am a member of
      SG-1." -- Dr. Daniel Jackson
      ****************
      Save Daniel Jackson: http://www.savedanieljackson.com
      Ashton Press: http://ashtonpress.net/
      Fan Fiction: http://fanfic.ashtonpress.net/
      Fanzines: http://fanzines.ashtonpress.net/
      Gateway, A Stargate Slash Discussion/Fiction Group:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Gateway/join
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 02:35:41 -0400
      From:    KLZ3 <KZIMMERMAN3@cox.net>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      > -Debbie (aggravated by shows that get canceled right after a
      >          cliffhanger end-of-season episode)
      
      Oh, you want one like that, how about Robin of Sherwood?  Marion
      is probably *still* in that daggoned convent and Robert is still
      moping.
      
      ZK (WHY was Farscape cancelled?)(Sheesh!)(Next thing they'll
      cancel Captain Kangaroo!)(Oh, wait, they did)
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 02:41:16 -0400
      From:    KLZ3 <KZIMMERMAN3@cox.net>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      > Scifi said that they didn't want anymore space shows and it seems that
      > they
      > are kicking out the current space shows, too.
      
      WHAT?!?  Are they nuts?  The meat of Sci-Fi has *always* been
      space shows!  So they're going to do "All Steven King, All the
      Time"?
      
      I haven't gotten as intrigued by a show for as long as I did on
      HL since HL.  I liked Due South; recorded it even, but haven't
      watched it since.  Stargate?  I got so annoyed at no new eps for
      months on end that I dumped Showtime and stopped watching it.
      
      ZK
      (Clancy Brown is in Breaking News)(Looks good)(Why am I up
      watching it?)
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 08:53:02 +0200
      From:    Marina Bailey <tmar@sifl.iid.co.za>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      Barbara wrote:
      >Has anyone studied people like us?  Seriously. Maybe there is a URL for a
      >research paper or essay somewhere? Ones who tend to watch sci-fi/fantasy
      >shows (aka shows-that-keep-getting-cancelled) rather than ordinary
      >shows?  I have recognized listers from here on both my Farscape and
      >Witchblade lists so there is some sort of common thread weaving through us.
      
      I don't know if that specific thing has been studied, but maybe it
      should be. In my experience there are a lot of us, we're just far
      apart geographically. I often recognize people from other (often
      obscure) fandoms, too.
      
      >I ask this because I live in a VERY rural area and sometimes feel very
      >alone. Not *lonely*, but *alone* if that makes sense.
      
      I understand completely where you are coming from. Imagine being one
      of only two people in the entire country (that you know of) who
      likes slash. And when the other person (hi Tarryn) is over 400 miles
      away, things get a bit difficult. Science fiction is still considered
      "weird" here; most people of every colour and culture are addicted
      to sport (including cricket, the most boring game ever invented). We
      can't even have conventions because so few people would show up. Even
      science fiction gatherings only attract 50 or so people. We're getting
      a bit more SF on TV now (during apartheid, science fiction was a HUGE
      no-no; it advocated all sorts of "dangerous" ideas - our local
      broadcaster, the SABC, never even showed all of Classic Trek - too
      liberal for their tastes), but there are still very few people who
      like that kind of thing in this country.
      
      (For some reason, though, Highlander was extremely popular. At one
      stage it was the #1 show on TV here!)
      
      >Barbara (who admits to watching Survivor though)
      
      Don't worry, I used to watch it too. I got over it during the
      one where they were on the tropical island. Talk about boring!
      (I don't even know - or care - who won.)
      
      >(and thanks goodness that 24 is coming back or she would overdose
      >on HGTV's decorating shows)
      
      That sounds like me. Too many decorating shows on BBC Prime. :)
      
      - Marina.
      
      \\  "You've heard it said that living well is  ||>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  //
      //   the best revenge? Au contraire - living   || R I C H I E >>  \\
      \\   forever is the best revenge." - Lacroix   ||>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  //
      //=====Marina Bailey====tmar@sifl.iid.co.za====||                 \\
      \\=============Chief Flag Waver and Defender of Richie============//
      
      "There is a Daniel Jackson-shaped hole in that show." - My brother,
      about the sixth season of Stargate SG-1.
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 08:55:07 +0200
      From:    Marina Bailey <tmar@sifl.iid.co.za>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      ZK wrote:
      >(Clancy Brown is in Breaking News)(Looks good)(Why am I up
      >watching it?)
      
      Good point. It must be like 2 in the morning over there.
      
      - Marina.
      
      \\  "You've heard it said that living well is  ||>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  //
      //   the best revenge? Au contraire - living   || R I C H I E >>  \\
      \\   forever is the best revenge." - Lacroix   ||>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  //
      //=====Marina Bailey====tmar@sifl.iid.co.za====||                 \\
      \\=============Chief Flag Waver and Defender of Richie============//
      
      "There is a Daniel Jackson-shaped hole in that show." - My brother,
      about the sixth season of Stargate SG-1.
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 05:19:04 -0500
      From:    Basaxl <Basaxl@camalott.com>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      --=======7C05C5E=======
      Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-1E76796; charset=us-ascii
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
      
      Whoops,I guess I should have  stated that my letter was written tongue in
      cheek.The series wins a  Saturn award for best show  and the SciFi channel
      pats Farscape  with one hand and slits their throat with the other.I'm so
      *George Carlined* off I can't see straight.I've already written to the
      programing director with the names of twenty five people who watch it here
      and their e-mail addies.I know it probably won't do any good but I feel
      better knowing I tried.You'll have to excuse me,I'm venting!This is the
      first show since Highlander that I've really gotten into.My friends and I
      are also writing the companies that advertise during the Farscape hour and
      letting them know how unhappy we are at the show being canceled.Little
      Friskies may get switched to Nine Lives because it upsets me every time I
      think of the series being canceled and my 22 cats really LIKE Little
      Friskies LOL!!!
      I started supporting Little Friskies because they sponsored my fav show.
      Think it'll work?? Sigh, me neither....I've been here too many times.I
      think I'll go to Ginny's website and try to meditate and center myself.I do
      wish there was something we could do to save the show.....
      with you in pain
      Basaxl
      
      --=======7C05C5E=======
      Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-avg=cert; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-1E76796
      Content-Disposition: inline
      
      
      ---
      Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
      Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
      Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 8/2/02
      
      --=======7C05C5E=======--
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 08:40:28 EDT
      From:    Bizarro7@aol.com
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      In a message dated 9/7/02 11:19:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
      Data@cyberg8t.com writes:
      
      << Scifi said that they didn't want anymore space shows and it seems that they
       are kicking out the current space shows, too.
      
       *grumbles about how the B5LR series never came into existance and now this*
      
       Grrr....*goes to brood* >>
      
      I remember seeing that press release about the Sci-Fi Channel 'not wanting
      anymore space shows'  with some bemusement. This would explain why they've
      hardly used the Stargate itself this season, on the show of the same name.
      It's been mostly Earthbound intrigue, something the writers deny upon
      question.
      
      Leah
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 14:00:23 +0100
      From:    "John Mosby (B)" <a.j.mosby@btinternet.com>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      As always, it seems that there is more/less going on than initially
      reported. Though the show HAS been cancelled, it may not have been Sci-Fi's
      preffered decision....
      
      Check out this chat with Anthony Simcoe (who played D'Argo)......
      
      http://community.spacecast.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=00
      1147
      
      John
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 09:54:03 -0400
      From:    Karla <julkm@cox.net>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      And the latest tv guide lists it at the beginning with returning shows. It
      says it returns in January of 2003.
      
      
      
      
      
      > Where do you keep getting the cancel rumors????- Farscape has been
      > officially renewed for its fourth and fifth seasons on the SCI FI Channel,
      > making it the longest-running original series in the channel's history.
      > SCI FI congratulated Farscape, which earned this year's Saturn Award for
      > Best Syndicated/Cable Television Series, and series star Ben Browder, who
      > received the Saturn Award for Best Actor on Television.I don't think they
      > want to kill a show that has this much going for it.
      > NEW EPISODES of Farscape will return in January of 2003, when SEASON FOUR
      > continues!   This was taken directly from the SciFi site.
      > Basaxl
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > >Frell frell frell frell frell! *grumbles*  I like that show, too!! Ugh.
      > >
      > >Scifi said that they didn't want anymore space shows and it seems that
      they
      > >are kicking out the current space shows, too.
      > >
      > >*grumbles about how the B5LR series never came into existance and now
      this*
      > >
      > >Grrr....*goes to brood*
      > >
      > >Jen
      > >----- Original Message -----
      > >From: "John Mosby (B)" <a.j.mosby@btinternet.com>
      > >To: <HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU>
      > >Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 5:10 AM
      > >Subject: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      > >
      > >
      > >> Sooooooooo.
      > >>
      > >> Farscape cancelled. Officially
      > >>
      > >> Well.......frell.
      > >>
      > >>
      > >> John
      > >>
      > >>
      > >
      > >
      > >---
      > >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
      > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
      > >Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 8/2/02
      > >
      >
      
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      ----
      
      
      >
      > ---
      > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
      > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
      > Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 8/2/02
      >
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:10:36 +0100
      From:    "John Mosby (B)" <a.j.mosby@btinternet.com>
      Subject: Re: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      No, there's some confusion here, so let's clarify.
      
      Farscape HAS been cancelled. Though the show was seemingly renewed for two
      seasons (taking it to five in total), there was apparently a clause in the
      contract that could be implemented if Sci-Fi were unhappy with ratings.
      Though there seem to be other (lesser) factors involved - such as the
      financial problems of EM TV, the company that owns Henson - it appears to be
      Sci-Fi that have decided not to take the option of the fifth season.
      
      While there has been no word from Henson or Sci-Fi (probably as every
      eventuality is being explored), David Kemper, Richard Manning and Ben
      Browder did do an *official* chat on Friday and revealed that the sets would
      be torn down forever in just over a week's time. Pilot is already dismantled
      and boxed!  Kemper, Manning and Browder said that the only chance wa sa
      massive fan response, though this would have to be immediate to have any
      response.
      
      The confusion over 'new' episodes comes from the fact that Sci-Fi has split
      both Stargate and Farscape into two half seasons. The US has seen the first
      half of these seasons, though the most recent 'new' episodes were often
      inaccurately referred to (even by Sci-Fi) as 'season finales'.  Each season
      is actually 22 episodes long and the remaining 11 shows of the fourth
      Farscape season will be seen in the US in the new year. Then that's it.
      
      It is possible, yet again, that the UK will see th eend of SG1 and Farscape
      ahead of our friends across the big pond.
      
      There's more information beign updated at:
      http://farscape.wdsection.com/index.html
      
      
      John
      
      
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Karla" <julkm@cox.net>
      To: <HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU>
      Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 2:54 PM
      Subject: Re: [HL] (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      
      
      > And the latest tv guide lists it at the beginning with returning shows. It
      > says it returns in January of 2003.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > > Where do you keep getting the cancel rumors????- Farscape has been
      > > officially renewed for its fourth and fifth seasons on the SCI FI
      Channel,
      > > making it the longest-running original series in the channel's history.
      > > SCI FI congratulated Farscape, which earned this year's Saturn Award for
      > > Best Syndicated/Cable Television Series, and series star Ben Browder,
      who
      > > received the Saturn Award for Best Actor on Television.I don't think
      they
      > > want to kill a show that has this much going for it.
      > > NEW EPISODES of Farscape will return in January of 2003, when SEASON
      FOUR
      > > continues!   This was taken directly from the SciFi site.
      > > Basaxl
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > >Frell frell frell frell frell! *grumbles*  I like that show, too!! Ugh.
      > > >
      > > >Scifi said that they didn't want anymore space shows and it seems that
      > they
      > > >are kicking out the current space shows, too.
      > > >
      > > >*grumbles about how the B5LR series never came into existance and now
      > this*
      > > >
      > > >Grrr....*goes to brood*
      > > >
      > > >Jen
      > > >----- Original Message -----
      > > >From: "John Mosby (B)" <a.j.mosby@btinternet.com>
      > > >To: <HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU>
      > > >Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 5:10 AM
      > > >Subject: (OT) Another one bites the dust.....
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >> Sooooooooo.
      > > >>
      > > >> Farscape cancelled. Officially
      > > >>
      > > >> Well.......frell.
      > > >>
      > > >>
      > > >> John
      > > >>
      > > >>
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >---
      > > >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
      > > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
      > > >Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 8/2/02
      > > >
      > >
      >
      >
      > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
      --
      > ----
      >
      >
      > >
      > > ---
      > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
      > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
      > > Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 8/2/02
      > >
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 11:07:32 -0400
      From:    Elaine Nicol <ElaineN@compuserve.com>
      Subject: Re: Doc Anne  (wasQs (was--  Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander 5?"))
      
      It's been a long time since I got involved in any of these sort of
      discussions but Dr Anne needs someone to defend her here. :-) So here
      goes.<EG>
      
      I think the primary complaint against Anne was that she wasn't Tessa or
      Amanda.  Just my opinion.
      
      >>
      Miniskirts & tight sweaters sabotaged the character <<
      
      I agree with this, but I do also realise that was wardrobe that did that.
      
      >> Anne was ALWAYS cranky about something--DM or otherwise--while a winning
      attitude could have helped immensely. <<
      
      I didn't find her that way - yes sometimes she was cranky but aren't we
      all, often when she wasn't cranky Duncan was.
      
      >> That's where I blame LH in part, as she gave Anne zero charm,
      grace & humor. <<
      
      I'm sorry but I have to completely disagree with you here.
      
      >> DM is a special guy is LOTS of ways, & it strains credulity
      that he'd spend much time enjoying the company of a frumpy grump. <<
      
      He is also a complete pain in the bahooky at times, arrogant and selfish
      fairly typical Scottish male actually.
      
      >> Let's see--Anne violated her lover's privacy by seeking out his medical
      records w/o permission. <<
      
      Okay it was unprofessional - but the man you have just started seeing you
      are really interested in him and then you start to realise there is
      something odd about him, no I don't think she did anything most of us
      wouldn't do in the same situation.
      
      >>  She also prescribed sleeping pills to said
      lover--despite NOT being his doctor, <<
      
      At that point she was dealing with him as a lover and friend.  How often
      have you given someone asprin or any other bit of medicine without knowing
      if they have an allergy - I know I have.
      
      >> Then, she "accidentally" got pregnant; admittedly, that's personal
      rather than professional, but in a DOCTOR & in these circumstances, I find
      it to be overwhelmingly dumb. <<
      
      In normal circumstance yes, but how many women have got themselves into
      trouble of one sort or another while suffering through grief, she was
      trying to recover from losing Duncan - and before you throw stones at her
      for that what was the first thing Duncan did after losing Tessa - Annie
      Devlin.  Point is Anne wasn't thinking straight and personally if she had
      been the cold perfect person that people seemed to want her to be Duncan
      would never have looked at her twice.
      
      >> Worst of all, probably, she risked herself, the life
      of her soon-to-be born child, & the lives of emergency workers <<
      
      So now she behaves like the professional everyone wants her to be and that
      is wrong too, can't win can she.
      
      Anne was someone thrown into an amazing situation ask yourself how you
      would react - I for one really don't know - oh in the nice cozy fictional
      world of Highlander I would love it, but in the real world well that's a
      different game.
      
      Personally I don't think anything Anne did would have made the fans love
      her - the majority of fans wanted Tessa back I know I did, but I grew to
      love Anne too.
      
      Don't get me wrong with all this criticism of Duncan I love him dearly
      faults and all, and he has plenty of those it was one of the things that
      made him real.
      
      Elaine.
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 8 Sep 2002 12:12:47 -0400
      From:    Sandy Fields <diamonique@comcast.net>
      Subject: Re: Doc Anne  (wasQs (was--  Re: D & P's power (was" Highlander 5?"))
      
      At 11:07 AM 09/08/02, Elaine Nicol wrote:
      >It's been a long time since I got involved in any of these sort of
      >discussions but Dr Anne needs someone to defend her here. :-) So here
      >goes.<EG>
      
      And I'll jump in after you. :-)
      
      >I think the primary complaint against Anne was that she wasn't Tessa or
      >Amanda.  Just my opinion.
      
      I think you'd be wrong here.  I think, as Nina said, that Anne was supposed
      to be a great love for Duncan (as stated by Adrian in an AOL chat before
      Anne's first season), but she was written and acted contrary to that end. I
      thought the whole idea of Duncan falling in love with a smart independent
      woman was great... but the whole thing lost a lot in the translation.  I
      immediately liked her the first couple of times we were introduced to her
      (I loved how she made him leave the hospital <g>), and I was looking
      forward to watching the relationship develop.  But once the two of them
      started dating, and we began to see more of the character, there were
      things about her that just didn't work for me.  Lack of c_________ between
      the two characters was a major problem.
      
      Nina:
      >Miniskirts & tight sweaters sabotaged the character <<
      
      Elaine:
      >I agree with this, but I do also realise that was wardrobe that did that.
      
      Me:
      Of course it was.  And that is one of the reasons the character didn't
      work. Whoever planned Dr. Ann's wardrobe should be shot.  Wardrobe helps to
      define a character, and this was a totally wacked definition IMO.
      
      Nina:
      > >> Anne was ALWAYS cranky about something--DM or otherwise--while a
      > winning attitude could have helped immensely. <<
      
      
      Elaine:
      >I didn't find her that way - yes sometimes she was cranky but aren't we
      >all, often when she wasn't cranky Duncan was.
      
      Me:
      But that's beside the point of the discussion.  We're talking about Dr.
      Anne, who we -- the audience -- were supposed to accept (maybe even
      embrace) as Duncan's love interest.  Making her cranky all the time doesn't
      serve to endear the character to the audience.  We needed to see something
      in this character that would show us why Duncan was so interested in
      her.  We were never shown anything like that.
      
      Nina:
      > >> That's where I blame LH in part, as she gave Anne zero charm,
      >grace & humor. <<
      
      Elaine:
      >I'm sorry but I have to completely disagree with you here.
      
      Me:
      I'm with Nina on that one. :-)  No charm, no humor.
      
      Nina:
      > >> DM is a special guy is LOTS of ways, & it strains credulity that he'd
      > spend much time enjoying the company of a frumpy grump. <<
      
      Elaine:
      >He is also a complete pain in the bahooky at times, arrogant and selfish
      >fairly typical Scottish male actually.
      
      Me:
      Yep.  I'll agree there.  But again... that's not the point of the
      discussion.  We're not analyzing Duncan.  We're analyzing Anne.  Also,
      those characteristics of Duncan's personality are good reasons for him
      *not* to be interested in Anne.
      
      Nina:
      > >> Let's see--Anne violated her lover's privacy by seeking out his
      > medical records w/o permission. <<
      
      Elaine:
      >Okay it was unprofessional - but the man you have just started seeing you
      >are really interested in him and then you start to realise there is
      >something odd about him, no I don't think she did anything most of us
      >wouldn't do in the same situation.
      
      Me.
      I'll agree on that one.  But I always wondered what she planned to do with
      the info... if she had found anything.  And the fact that she didn't find
      anything (something that was even more questionable and mysterious) didn't
      seem to be a major issue with her (unless I'm forgetting something, which
      is entirely possible).  So what was the point?
      
      Nina:
      > >>  She also prescribed sleeping pills to said lover--despite NOT being
      > his doctor, <<
      
      Elaine:
      >At that point she was dealing with him as a lover and friend.  How often
      >have you given someone asprin or any other bit of medicine without knowing
      >if they have an allergy - I know I have.
      
      I'll agree with you here. I think that although this is a no-no, I'm sure
      plenty of doctors do this.  So for me, this didn't put a checkmark in the
      "against Anne" column.
      
      Nina:
      > >> Then, she "accidentally" got pregnant; admittedly, that's personal
      > rather than professional, but in a DOCTOR & in these circumstances, I
      > find it to be  overwhelmingly dumb. <<
      
      Elaine:
      >In normal circumstance yes, but how many women have got themselves into
      >trouble of one sort or another while suffering through grief, she was
      >trying to recover from losing Duncan - and before you throw stones at her
      >for that what was the first thing Duncan did after losing Tessa - Annie Devlin.
      
      Me:
      Um... I don't know that this was the point Nina was making. I think we
      understand the sex part (at least I do).  It's the getting pregnant part
      that was dumb. Doesn't this woman use birth control?  Did she immediately
      stop using it when Duncan "died"?  Having sex doesn't have to result in
      pregnancy.
      
      Elaine:
      >Point is Anne wasn't thinking straight and personally if she had been the
      >cold perfect person that people seemed to want her to be Duncan would
      >never have looked at her twice.
      
      To me she *was* cold.  There was no warmth in this character.
      
      Nina:
      > >> Worst of all, probably, she risked herself, the life of her soon-to-be
      > born child, & the lives of emergency workers <<
      
      Elaine:
      >So now she behaves like the professional everyone wants her to be and that
      >is wrong too, can't win can she.
      
      Me:
      I don't see that as professional behavior at all.
      
      Elaine:
      >Anne was someone thrown into an amazing situation ask yourself how you
      >would react - I for one really don't know - oh in the nice cozy fictional
      >world of Highlander I would love it, but in the real world well that's a
      >different game.
      
      Me:
      So true.  But I think I can be 99% sure that -- all things being equal -- I
      wouldn't have gone down into the bowels of that blown-up building.
      
      Elaine:
      >Personally I don't think anything Anne did would have made the fans love
      >her - the majority of fans wanted Tessa back I know I did, but I grew to
      >love Anne too.
      
      I never knew Tessa. I came into HL after Tessa was out of the show. And I
      do think there's something that could have been done to help the fans warm
      to Anne. They could have shown the development of the relationship between
      the two characters. We needed to see some warm fuzzy moments... some sparks
      between them. Did they ever have any fun together? Did they ever have any
      special bonding moments.. either in bed or out?  We needed to be let in on
      the growth of the relationship (and a happy non-cranky Anne) before
      circumstances made the relationship start to go sour so we could understand
      Duncan's feelings for her and also see another side to her besides just the
      cranky, awkwardness.
      
      If we had been able to understand his feelings for her -- even if we didn't
      think she was right for him -- the really bad parts would have had more
      oomph... they would have been more effective... because we would have felt
      Duncan's loss.  But we couldn't feel bad about him losing her if we were
      never able to feel his love for her.
      
      >Don't get me wrong with all this criticism of Duncan I love him dearly
      >faults and all, and he has plenty of those it was one of the things that
      >made him real.
      
      I'll definitely agree here.
      
      -- Sandy
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 7 Sep 2002 to 8 Sep 2002 - Special issue (#2002-138)
      *****************************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 8 Sep 2002 (#2002-139)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 6 Sep 2002 to 7 Sep 2002 (#2002-137)"