HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jul 2001 (#2001-189)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@LISTS.PSU.EDU)
      Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:00:01 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jul 2001 to 11 Jul 2001 - Special issue"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jul 2001 - Special issue (#2001-188)"

      --------
      There are 10 messages totalling 411 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. ATTN: All Fan Fic writers (6)
        2. Berne Convention, Copyright, fair use and moral rights
        3. further OT..was    O/T: List mommy's e-mail address?
        4. : ATTN: All Fan Fic writers
        5. Jim Byrnes Show
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:32:08 +0100
      From:    Jette Goldie <jette@blueyonder.co.uk>
      Subject: Re: ATTN: All Fan Fic writers
      
      Lisa K takes on Marina
      
      > Marina says:
      >
      > > I never said that not liking slash made you homophobic. I said that
      > > pontificating about slash being disgusting, and more immoral than
      > > the rest of fanfic, made someone with that opinion homophobic.
      >
      > Well, actually, what you said was (from previous response to Nina):
      >
      > Nina:
      > >That doesn't mean that people
      > >who dislike slash are homophobic.
      >
      > You:
      > Ri-ight.
      >
      > Me, now:  I must admit that this sounds an awful lot like you're saying
      that
      > people who don't like slash are homophobic.  I do realize that the
      conversation
      > from which this exchange came also included discussion about slash fanfic
      being
      > singled out, and that other aspects of the whole discussion may have
      affected
      > your response, but if your point was as you elaborate above, I don't think
      that's
      > clear from the text.
      >
      
      I have a couple of gay friends who find slashfic - especially
      slash written by straight women - to be (in their words)
      "prurient and disgusting".
      
      I guess they're homophobic, huh?  ;-)
      
      Jette
      Glory may be fleeting, but obscurity is forever!
      bosslady@scotlandmail.com
      http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/fanfic.html
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:25:22 +0100
      From:    Jette Goldie <jette@blueyonder.co.uk>
      Subject: Re: ATTN: All Fan Fic writers
      
      Marina
      > Okay, I lied. <g> John just always brings up interesting points.
      > (Where ARE you, BTW? Because in the States it's only... 4 a.m. and
      > that's in NY. Who is awake at 4 a.m.?)
      
      John's in England, UK, Marina. Thought everyone knew that ;-)
      
      Jette
      Glory may be fleeting, but obscurity is forever!
      bosslady@scotlandmail.com
      http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/fanfic.html
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:28:16 +0100
      From:    Jette Goldie <jette@blueyonder.co.uk>
      Subject: Re: ATTN: All Fan Fic writers
      
      > Unfortunately, these days fandom is filled with idiots. I mean,
      > when rubbish like Star Trek Voyager has fans, that's it, really.
      
      
      and no doubt the ST:Voy fans would say "when rubbish
      like that Highlander has fans, well, the world has gone to
      hell in a handbasket"
      
      Different strokes, Marina.  You keep arguing for that in
      relation to your fondness for slashfic, accord other people
      the same curtesy in regard to their viewing.
      
      Jette (enjoyes Voyager from time to time)
      Glory may be fleeting, but obscurity is forever!
      bosslady@scotlandmail.com
      http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/fanfic.html
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:56:51 -0400
      From:    Dragon Lady <dragonlady@darkmage.net>
      Subject: Berne Convention, Copyright, fair use and moral rights
      
      Just thought some may be interested in reading what the Berne Convention
      says about the protection of "Literary and Artistic Works" :
      
      http://www.law.cornell.edu/treaties/berne/overview.html
      
      I found this interesting:
      
      BERNE CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF LITERARY AND ARTISTIC WORKS (Paris
      Text 1971)
      Moral Rights -- Article 6bis
      
      (1) Independently of the author's economic rights, and even after the
      transfer of the said rights, the author shall have the right to claim
      authorship of the work and to object to any distortion, mutilation or other
      modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work,
      which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation.
      
      
      And here's a good roundup of information and materials on Copyright & Fair Use:
      http://fairuse.stanford.edu/
      
      And yes, The Mitchell Estate has lost the injunction ruling battle (for
      now) for the "Gone with the Wind" parody ... but I'm sure the war is far
      from over.
      
      --DL
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:26:30 -1000
      From:    Geiger <geiger@maui.net>
      Subject: Re: further OT..was    O/T: List mommy's e-mail address?
      
      mouse--
      > When did lists become run by mommy and daddy?
      
      Probably when so many list members acted like children.
      
      Nina
      geiger@maui.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:50:16 -0400
      From:    Sandy Fields <diamonique@earthlink.net>
      Subject: Re: ATTN: All Fan Fic writers
      
      At 06:32 PM 07/10/2001 +0100, Jette Goldie wrote:
      
      >I have a couple of gay friends who find slashfic - especially
      >slash written by straight women - to be (in their words)
      >"prurient and disgusting".
      >
      >I guess they're homophobic, huh?  ;-)
      
      ROFLMBO!!!  Thanks for that one Jette!
      
      -- Sandy
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 21:07:01 +0200
      From:    Marina Bailey <fdd-tmar@netactive.co.za>
      Subject: Re: ATTN: All Fan Fic writers
      
      Jette wrote:
      >I have a couple of gay friends who find slashfic - especially
      >slash written by straight women - to be (in their words)
      >"prurient and disgusting".
      >I guess they're homophobic, huh?  ;-)
      
      You don't really want me to answer that, do you? :) :)
      
      I have gay friends who just roll their eyes at it. And then
      give me pointers for my next story. (To say nothing of arriving
      at my house with gay porn and instructions to watch it
      forthwith.) (Oops... was that too much information?)
      
      - Marina. (I had one post left, and this is it.) (I *thought*
      John was in England, but you could not tell from his email
      address.) (You'd be amazed at how many people think .za stands
      for Zambia or Zaire.) (At least they got the right continent.)
      
      \\ "You can spend precious time marching in your   ||>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  //
      // perfect lines, but I don't hear that drum; I'm  || R I C H I E >>  \\
      \\  looking for something else. And if you don't   ||>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  //
      //like what you see, you don't have to look at me."||                 \\
      \\==fdd-tmar@netactive.co.za=Chief Flag Waver and Defender of Richie==//
      
      "Cultural artifacts always come alive and take over the ship." - My
      brother, watching Star Trek Voyager.
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:37:09 -1000
      From:    Geiger <geiger@maui.net>
      Subject: Re: : ATTN: All Fan Fic writers
      
      Carrie--
      
      >  Simply distributing fan fic weather it be
      > e-mail, website or whatever is not illegal so long as money is not being
      > made w/o permission of the owner of the copyright. Please, correct me if
      I'm
      > wrong, but that is my understanding of it.
      
      Ok, you are wrong.  Violating someone's ownership rights is a separate issue
      from making money out of it.  Either way, the violator is in the wrong,
      legally & morally; unless money is at stake, it may well not be worthwhile
      for the violated to DO anything about it.  But, not being caught is not the
      same thing as being in the right.
      
      >>>Ok, I'm a big girl here, so I will admit that I did read that post wrong.
      My
      apologies. I went and re-read what Nina had written.>>>
      
      Thanks.
      
      >>>But I have a question to what she meant by "And, I also think ALL fans
      are punished for fanfic writers' selfishexcesses, just as we are ALL
      punished when TPTB, actors, etc. react reasonably to things like stalkers."
      When have we been punished due to fan fic? I don't recall ever hearing
      anything about that. I'm curious to know.>>>
      
      AP can't know WHICH fan is a stalking fanatic & so (very reasonably) at cons
      & such may keep everyone at a distance; given his experiences, occasionally
      he's got to wonder when he deals w/ his fans--"Is _she_ gonna threaten my
      family?"  And, so we are ALL punished by the excesses of a few loons--just
      by having that (very reasonable) suspicion intrude.
      
      In the same way, TPTB can't know WHICH fan is a writer possibly planning to
      use their universe w/o permission & so may keep fans at a distance & regard
      us ALL w/ some suspicion.   And, those actors who don't like what they've
      seen done to their characters/themselves in fanfic are also going to
      remember that when dealing w/ ALL fans &, again, it can color everything,
      for everyone.  Maybe even assuming we've mostly all READ net-distributed
      fanfic that offended them could be off-putting.  Maybe to the point that
      they don't attend cons, or if they do the Q&A sessions are restricted, etc.
      So, I do think the excesses of the relatively few fanfic writers who widely
      distribute their work can impact the majority of fans negatively.
      
      Jo--
      >>>I'm sure the Mitchell Trusts, owners of the copyright
      on 'Gone with the Wind' would love to hear this if it
      were true, given that they just lost an injunction to
      stop the publication of a book that did just this.   A
      parody, that uses someone else's character and plot
      and idea, is fully protected under Fair Use.
      Fair Use, as it applies to fan fiction, has never been
      tested in court.   Until it has your view, that fan
      fiction is not covered by fair use, is no more or less
      valid than mine, that it is.>>>
      
      That has nothing to do w/ what we're talking about.  Fanfic isn't parody
      (unless the sheer crappy quality of 90% of fanfic makes it laughable enough,
      & since most fanfic is deadly serious about itself, it just isn't parody
      regardless).
      
      Fanfic is rooted so firmly in the stolen universe that "fair use" would be
      an enormous stretch.  It certainly hasn't been interpreted that way to date,
      & I'm not aware of any reason to think it ever will be; if it were, then
      very, very little material would be protected, & I don't see property rights
      law going in that direction any time soon.
      
      
      Leah responds in character to Marina--
      (Marina)>>>And I'm not disagreeing with you in the least! I'm really just
      fighting with Nina because it's fun. :)>>>
      
      (Leah)>>>For awhile, but it gets predictable really quickly. Some fight
      simply to
      watch the ripples they make, not the points. I stopped opening her posts
      many
      months back and find this list ever so much better.>>>
      
      Pleasant as always, Leah.  Maybe if you read stuff (or could admit to doing
      so) from the people who disagree w/ you, you'd learn something.  Like not
      egregiously violating copyright, in a discussion about copyright violations,
      for instance.  I do TRY to read your stuff, Leah, but I confess that I'm not
      always successful at wading through it.
      
      Nina
      geiger@maui.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:01:11 -0400
      From:    Johanne Briere <jojoann@videotron.ca>
      Subject: Jim Byrnes Show
      
      Bonsoir tout le monde,
      
      September 98 , a few different group of people visited Vancouver. Part of
      their stay was to assist to the taping of the Jim Byrnes Show. Four
      differents shows were taped on the day we headed to the studio at the CBC.
      
      If these shows airs in order, you can see them on the Canadian Bravo
      Network. Tonight was one of them, rerunning tomorrow morning 8 am (Eastern
      Time). They air on Tuesday night 7:30 pm, rerun the following morning at 8.
      If your cable service does not provide Canadian Bravo Network, you should
      phone them to get it and while you are at it - ask them for Space as well.
      You will get HL three times a days, in order, complete , uncut. :)
      
      Else find a Canadian friend ,
      
      @+,
      
      JoAnne
      jojoann@videotron.ca
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:16:42 -1000
      From:    Geiger <geiger@maui.net>
      Subject: Re: ATTN: All Fan Fic writers
      
      John--
      > Some writers write because...the alternative is unthinkable.
      
      Yes, but if what they write is fanfic, they have no right to distribute it.
      To most professional writers, I would think that writing & distributing w/o
      permission material based in a universe created by _other_ writers would be
      truly unthinkable.
      
      
      Marina--
      > Nita wrote:
      
      Actually, it's Nina.
      
      Marina--
      > But why would they look for it in the first place? (My conscience
      > doesn't need soothing, thanks.) They'd still have to go to a search
      > engine and type in keywords, etc. And that isn't always a guarantee
      > that the right thing will pop up in the search first time. What
      > search engine do you use, that you look for Highlander and find
      > slash? Cause I wanna get that one!!
      
      Search ANYPLACE for "Highlander" & you'll get a slew of fan sites; many host
      fanfic, & a lot of those include slash.  Want to cut it down to mere
      seconds?  Search for "Highlander + fanfic," "Highlander + slash," etc.  This
      really isn't difficult, & I'm pretty sure even a fandom-novice TV exec could
      figure out how to locate fanfic quickly & easily on the Internet--thanks to
      fanfic authors being so quick to distribute that way.
      
      > Who's stealing anything? Any idiot knows that the HL (or Star Trek
      > or whatever) universe doesn't belong to the fanfic writer. Including
      > the fanfic writer herself.
      
      Exactly.  So, where's the right to take someone else's intellectual property
      w/o permission & use it for your own purposes?  To not only write
      fanfic--fine--but to widely distribute it--not fine.  OTHER THAN--because
      you want to, & it's fun?
      
      > We're all always punished for anything idiots do. I don't see how
      > the excesses of a few people should mean that everyone else has to
      > suffer.
      
      Um--that's MY point, & you're in that "excesses" category, according to what
      you've posted here lately.
      
      > We try to keep fanfic underground
      > so that TPTB can pretend they don't know.
      
      But, if you don't want TPTB to "officially" know you are doing it, it must
      be a bad thing.  And if it's a bad thing, why keep doing it?  OTHER
      THAN--because you want to, & it's fun?
      
      Most things that hide under rocks are pretty nasty.
      
      
      me before--
      > >Slash is an extreme form of fanfic, so reactions to it are likely to be
      > >extreme.  It will therefore be singled out.  That doesn't mean that
      people
      > >who dislike slash are homophobic.
      
      Marina--
      > Ri-ight.
      
      That's it.  I'm really tired of trying to have a discussion w/ you, when all
      you do is spout flip nonsense & not-so-veiled insults.
      
      Your stated view boils down to--you know distributing fanfic is wrong, you
      don't care, & you will continue to do whatever you want no matter who it
      harms because it's fun for you.  Well, kindergartens are full of people w/
      that attitude.  So are prisons.
      
      Nina
      geiger@maui.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jul 2001 (#2001-189)
      ************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jul 2001 to 11 Jul 2001 - Special issue"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jul 2001 - Special issue (#2001-188)"