HIGHLA-L Digest - 26 Jan 2007 to 4 Feb 2007 (#2007-11)
HIGHLA-L automatic digest system (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
Sun, 4 Feb 2007 22:00:19 -0500
There are 3 messages totalling 105 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. wedding bells? (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 12:00:21 -1000
From: Nina Davis <macwestie@hawaii.rr.com>
Subject: wedding bells?
I heard a totally unsubstantiated rumor that AP recently got married.
Truth? Blatant hoax? Latest free publicity stunt by DPP?
Nina (any fresh news on The Source?) (anyone still care?)
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 22:41:13 -0000
From: John Mosby - Laptop <a.j.mosby@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: wedding bells?
Not true. I don't think he'd have had the time recently, anyway.
The Source is being re-edited. Maybe not as bad as it sounds as it could
well mean that Lionsgate are actually putting some more money into it for
extra oomph to the FX etc. I still stand by the fact that what I saw being
shot in Lithuania looked fantastic, but despite being the ra-ra guy for
positivity, I now have no reason to beleive that the film will now be out
anytime soon.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nina Davis" <macwestie@hawaii.rr.com>
To: <HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU>
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 10:00 PM
Subject: [HL] wedding bells?
>I heard a totally unsubstantiated rumor that AP recently got married.
> Truth? Blatant hoax? Latest free publicity stunt by DPP?
>
> Nina (any fresh news on The Source?) (anyone still care?)
>
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:03:53 -0500
From: Wendy <jjswbt@cox.net>
Subject: Re: wedding bells?
Nina asks:
> >I heard a totally unsubstantiated rumor that AP recently got married.
> > Truth? Blatant hoax? Latest free publicity stunt by DPP?
John reports;
> Not true. I don't think he'd have had the time recently, anyway.
How much time does it take? 5 minutes and judge/JP/shaman of
choice......
>>(any fresh news on The Source?) (anyone still care?)
> The Source is being re-edited.
I guess they decided that 103 minutes was too long and are going for 87
instead.
> Maybe not as bad as it sounds
<snicker>
> as it could well mean that Lionsgate are actually putting some more
money
> into it for extra oomph to the FX etc.
Yeah, that's what was wrong with it....cheap FX. Never mind the crappy
plot.
> I still stand by the fact that what I saw being
> shot in Lithuania looked fantastic,
Fantastic raw footage destined to be spliced together into an incoherent
mess.
> but despite being the ra-ra guy for positivity,
Which is what we love about you <eg>
>I now have no reason to beleive that the film
> will now be out anytime soon.
And to think they use to produce 48 minutes of really good work every
7-10 days......
Wendy ( Come one guys.)(Slap something together and release it.)(You can
always put out a Director's Cut later.)(You know you will anyway.)
------------------------------
End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 26 Jan 2007 to 4 Feb 2007 (#2007-11)
*************************************************************