HIGHLA-L Digest - 30 Mar 2005 to 5 Apr 2005 (#2005-33)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:00:06 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 5 Apr 2005 to 8 Apr 2005 (#2005-34)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 29 Mar 2005 to 30 Mar 2005 (#2005-32)"

      --------
      There is one message totalling 36 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Brosnan Back As Bond?
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:14:55 -0700
      From:    "R. Shelton" <rshelton2@earthlink.net>
      Subject: Brosnan Back As Bond?
      
      [looks like maybe it was publicity stunt after all... -R]
      
      http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2005-04-05/#3
      
      "All bets are off about the new James Bond - it looks like Pierce
      Brosnan may be back as the suave super spy after all. According to
      Internet reports, Sony bosses want Brosnan to return as 007 in the
      next Bond film Casino Royale, and they're keen for him to star in one
      more movie after that. A source tells website Darkhorizons.Com, "All
      the stuff we heard about Brosnan being out is just a ploy from both
      camps. The negotiations between Brosnan and Eon (Bond production
      company) came to an end because, in the last year, things were up in
      the air, thanks to all the organizational changes taking place.
      Brosnan/Eon camps are still going through the motions of bluffing
      each other: an echo of the old poker game that Cubby Broccoli (former
      Bond boss) went through with Roger Moore - Moore frequently announced
      that he wouldn't be back. The mood around Sony is that Brosnan will
      be back. Hence, the reluctance of the filmmakers to come right out
      and announce that they have parted ways with Brosnan. Sony are not in
      a gambling mood. They could lose more with an unknown actor, or with
      an experienced but unpopular actor. They're well aware that you just
      can't place any actor in this role."
      
      --
      Rachel Shelton
      rshelton2@earthlink.net
           @}->->->-
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 30 Mar 2005 to 5 Apr 2005 (#2005-33)
      *************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 5 Apr 2005 to 8 Apr 2005 (#2005-34)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 29 Mar 2005 to 30 Mar 2005 (#2005-32)"