HIGHLA-L Digest - 27 Jun 2004 to 28 Jun 2004 (#2004-122)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:00:03 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 28 Jun 2004 to 29 Jun 2004 (#2004-123)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 26 Jun 2004 to 27 Jun 2004 (#2004-121)"

      --------
      There are 3 messages totalling 112 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Watchers (Was:  Season Four dvds:  The Colonel)
        2. Too Good to be True?
        3. [highla] Immortals Among Us...For Real??
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:10:37 -0400
      From:    kageorge <kageorge@erols.com>
      Subject: Re: Watchers (Was:  Season Four dvds:  The Colonel)
      
      From: "Wendy Tillis" <immortals_incorporated@cox.net>
      > I'm sure Watchers fall into three categories. They all, I'd guess, start
      out being fascinated by the concept of Immortals and with the intention of
      just watching - cold, clinical but a great show. After a while,  some become
      revolted by these jerks who live forever and do such horrible things (to
      other Immortals and to mortals). This group either quit or become Hunters
      like Horton. A second, and by far the largest group, remain interested in
      the Immortals as an intellectual pursuit and manage to balance the horror
      that many Immortals are with the greatness of a few. They manage to watch
      the Game from the outside and don't allow themselves to become too
      emotionally involved - either pro or con. Ian is stereotypical of this
      group.  Then there is the third group who become so enamored of Immortals in
      general, or their personal Immortal in particular, that they can no longer
      watch without interacting. Joe is one example.Rita is another. Joe wants to
      *be* Duncan. He wants to be t!
      >  he hero. He wants to rescue the fair maidens and slay the evil doers. He
      wants to be young and healthy and mobile. If he can't be Duncan, he wants to
      be friends with Duncan. He wants to sit around the bar with Duncan and
      rehash old battles and old loves. He also wants to use Duncan as a weapon -
      to send Duncan out to right wrongs that Joe, himself, can't right. And he
      wants Duncan to win so that he is on the winning team - even if he's only
      cheering from the side-lines. He wasn't emotionally healthy when Ian
      recruited him and he never really totally recovered.
      >
      I agree with all of this.  I think the Watchers are fundamentally creepy,
      and while I like Joe as a character, there is something basically wrong
      about choosing a life of being a voyeur to a race of people who regularly
      chop other people's heads off.  It seems to me to be a given that these
      marginally functional people (those who join the Watchers would seem to be
      to be likely to be loaners and misfits to begin with) can easily succumb to
      either fanatical hatred or fanatical devotion.  Let's face it, we've seen
      the Watchers do far more bad things than good.  I'm not just talking about
      Horton and his gang, but the Watcher in "Run for Your Life" and again in
      "Pharaoh's Daughter" and again in "The Darkness.  Then we've got the whole
      Tribunal madness in "Judgment Day" and "OMTM."  These folks are a
      semi-criminal organization operating in secret, using covert methods of
      observation, and a breeding ground for whackos.
      
      MacG
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:20:52 EDT
      From:    EllnT@aol.com
      Subject: Too Good to be True?
      
      --part1_b6.2de6d363.2e11f3c4_boundary
      Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
      
      What do we think?
      
      
      Ellen
      
      _http://www.ruggedelegantliving.com/a/002906.html_
      (http://www.ruggedelegantliving.com/a/002906.html)
      
      
      _Click here:  http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=1471_
      (http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=1471)
      
      
      --part1_b6.2de6d363.2e11f3c4_boundary
      Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1088460822"
      
      Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
      
      _Click here:  http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=1471_
      (http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=1471)
      
      --part1_b6.2de6d363.2e11f3c4_boundary--
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:23:50 EDT
      From:    EllnT@aol.com
      Subject: Re: [highla] Immortals Among Us...For Real??
      
      In a message dated 6/26/2004 10:07:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
      twodeel@jornada.org writes:
      
      Weekly  World News, the tabloid
      that makes up all their stories (and probably  photographs too -- they're
      famous for their pictures of "Bat Boy"), and  should be read with
      appropriate skepticism.
      
      
      No!!!  Tell me it ain't SOOOOOOOO!   Aarrrrrrrrrggggggggghhhhhhh!!!
      
      If you can't believe the printed word what can you believe?  Next  you'll be
      telling me Hillary Clinton DIDN"T have an alien affair!
      
      <Snicker>  Couldn't resist.
      
      Ellen
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 27 Jun 2004 to 28 Jun 2004 (#2004-122)
      ***************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 28 Jun 2004 to 29 Jun 2004 (#2004-123)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 26 Jun 2004 to 27 Jun 2004 (#2004-121)"