HIGHLA-L Digest - 13 Jun 2004 to 14 Jun 2004 (#2004-107)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:00:04 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 14 Jun 2004 to 15 Jun 2004 (#2004-108)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jun 2004 to 13 Jun 2004 (#2004-106)"

      --------
      There are 4 messages totalling 96 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. OT: Re: Touching Evil (was-- The Innocent)
        2. Touching Evil (was-- The Innocent) (3)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 14 Jun 2004 00:29:22 EDT
      From:    Dotiran@aol.com
      Subject: OT: Re: Touching Evil (was-- The Innocent)
      
      Nina says:
      >> the male lead's performance a bit lacking
      
      Sorry he's not your cuppa.
      
      I think he is brilliant. Affable and frightening at one time.
      His reviews have been amazing. Here are just a few I found online.
      
      **"Jeffrey Donovan is breathtakingly good in the leading role, as Detective
      Dave Creegan"
      
      **"Jeffrey Donovan steals the show as Creegan "
      
      **"Jeffrey Donovan is a talented actor and makes Creegan very appealing; it's
      hard to pull off a character this complex, but he's doing just fine, thank
      you."
      
      **"Donovan as the kind of nutty guy we immediately love, .............The
      talented Donovan is joined by an able cast...."
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:10:51 -1000
      From:    MacWestie <mac.westie@verizon.net>
      Subject: Re: Touching Evil (was-- The Innocent)
      
      me before--
      > the male lead's performance a bit lacking
      
      Rottie--
      > I think he is brilliant. Affable and frightening at one time.
      > His reviews have been amazing. Here are just a few I found online.
      
      OK, I could find twice as many saying he's a disappointment, were my
      anal-retentive button pushed by this show like yours clearly is.  Reviews
      are like the Bible--available to support all sides.  (There were positive
      reviews of _Endgame_--only a few & obviously well-paid for, but still.)
      
      Vera Farmiga is brilliant in Touching Evil--totally mesmerizing.  She's
      always the best thing about whatever show she is in, & I remember her as far
      back as Roar opposite the delectible Heath Ledger.  (She would have made a
      super K'Immie.)  Petey Wingnut (recalling a real Highlander connection after
      all) was fabulous in his recurring role, & his tragic arc was outstandingly
      written.  Bradley Cooper as his "replacement" is less successful, I think.
      A brave move after Alias, this edgier role doesn't seem to suit him, so far.
      
      I hope Touching Evil gets a 2nd season, but there's certainly room for
      improvement--particularly w/ Jeffrey Donovan's take on the lead role.
      
      Nina
      mac.westie@verizon.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:31:46 -0400
      From:    Dotiran@aol.com
      Subject: Re: Touching Evil (was-- The Innocent)
      
      In a message dated 6/14/2004 4:10:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mac.westie@verizon.net writes:
      
      > I could find twice as many saying he's a disappointment,
      
      I didn't find any , could you show me the way?
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:33:01 -0400
      From:    Dotiran@aol.com
      Subject: Re: Touching Evil (was-- The Innocent)
      
      In a message dated 6/14/2004 4:10:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mac.westie@verizon.net writes:
      
      > were my
      > anal-retentive button pushed by this show like yours
      > clearly is.
      
      p.s. what on earth does the above mean? And since I am sure it is not a compliment :)  why bother saying it? You are always asking for a *discussion* but can it not exist without vituperativeness?
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 13 Jun 2004 to 14 Jun 2004 (#2004-107)
      ***************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 14 Jun 2004 to 15 Jun 2004 (#2004-108)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 Jun 2004 to 13 Jun 2004 (#2004-106)"