HIGHLA-L Digest - 17 Apr 2003 to 18 Apr 2003 (#2003-60)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Fri, 18 Apr 2003 22:00:20 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 18 Apr 2003 to 19 Apr 2003 (#2003-61)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 15 Apr 2003 to 17 Apr 2003 (#2003-59)"

      --------
      There are 5 messages totalling 195 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. New Cut of Endgame? (4)
        2. More alumni sightings.
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Thu, 17 Apr 2003 21:55:50 -0700
      From:    FKMel <sgt_buck_frobisher@yahoo.com>
      Subject: Re: New Cut of Endgame?
      
      But wasn't there an ep where a fortune teller told him
      he would never marry? Would that have been set before
      the marriage or after?
      
      Mel, who can't remember the episode name
      
      >
      > --> i agree that HL4 came out lacking but, com'on,
      > he was married one nite,
      > and that was it, it was over. and would you want to
      > admit what had happened
      > to anyone else? duncan was a private man. i can
      > accept that what happened in
      > HL4 with respects to duncan having been married to
      > not be too much a
      > contrdiction...
      
      
      =====
      FK:NickNatPacker, Knight of the Cross /Highlander: Duncan Flag-Waver/Due South fan/Tracker Fan/Angel Fan/Port Charles Fan
      Spotted on bumper sticker: Bad Cop! No Donut
      
      __________________________________________________
      Do you Yahoo!?
      The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
      http://search.yahoo.com
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:04:35 -0700
      From:    Lynn <lloschin@sprynet.com>
      Subject: Re: New Cut of Endgame?
      
      From: "FKMel" <sgt_buck_frobisher@YAHOO.COM>
      
      > But wasn't there an ep where a fortune teller told him
      > he would never marry? Would that have been set before
      > the marriage or after?
      
      More than 100 years afterward -- 1848.  The Endgame fb is 1715.
      
      Lynn
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Fri, 18 Apr 2003 06:09:19 -0700
      From:    Stephen Bryce <sibryce@yahoo.com>
      Subject: More alumni sightings.
      
      Hi guys.
      
      I just saw the first episode of "Children of Dune"
      (between having to tape it and the fact that it aired
      a few weeks later in Canada than in the U.S.), and I
      noticed that the guy who played Liam O'Rouke in "To
      Be" and "Not to Be" played one of the more immediate
      villains, named Scytale.
      
      Stephen Bryce
      
      =====
      If it's one thing Murphy's Law has taught me, it's to never be certain of anything.
      
      __________________________________________________
      Do you Yahoo!?
      The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
      http://search.yahoo.com
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:49:52 -1000
      From:    MacWestie <mac.westie@verizon.net>
      Subject: Re: New Cut of Endgame?
      
      >>>But wasn't there an ep where a fortune teller told him
      he would never marry? >>>
      
      
      
      Well, a gypsy prophecy isn't exactly fool-proof.
      
      
      
      But, DM told both Richie (in a Euro scene in The Darkness) & Anne
      (Obsession) straight out that he'd never been married.  OK-he might have
      lied to Anne because she was generally meddlesome & looked like a chipmunk,
      but WHY would DM have lied to Richie, particularly in that touching &
      clearly heart-felt scene?
      
      
      
      And, the whole tragically-never-married vibe ran through the series very
      strongly.  Is there anyone who, after watching 119 eps of HL:TS but before
      seeing Endgame, who would have said there was any real possibility DM had
      ever married?
      
      
      
      The most irksome thing is that it wasn't _necessary_ to the movie's
      plot that DM actually marry Her Overlippedness. In fact, it would have been
      much more in character (for the DM we knew in the series) for DM to have
      told his beloved about _his_ immortality _before_ the marriage, so she could
      make a rational decision about how her life would be. After all, what did he
      think he was doing to do--hide all the Immie battles from her? Plus, he
      could have let her get used to _his_ immortality, then telling her _she_
      could also be immortal-IF that's what she wanted. And, having seen Immie
      life up close, maybe she would have passed on all the longevity & the
      violence (as I think Tessa would probably have passed on it), or maybe she
      would have chosen it for herself. Really, Kate's being a pre-Immie was the
      best of all worlds, if handled correctly. Of course, the movie had DM
      botching it 100%. Did he just let the girl run off, in a bloody nightie,
      into the night? Did they ever get a divorce or annulment?  Did they never
      meet again, until the present? Didn't he explain immortality to her, at
      least the basics, as he did for even the likes of Marek & Johnny K?
      Shouldn't the movie have taken the time to tell us these things?
      
      
      
      And, by the way, another related Endgame screw-up was Faith's statement that
      DM had denied her children--that's plainly wrong; Line of Fire established
      that even pre-Immies are sterile.  Did Faith live 300 years as an Immie w/o
      learning _anything_?
      
      
      
      Nina (& DM's scabby knuckles in Endgame also irked me-like they didn't
      realize we'd be staring at every facet of him?)
      
      mac.westie@verizon.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Fri, 18 Apr 2003 20:08:33 -0400
      From:    Becky Doland <becky@beckyjo.com>
      Subject: Re: New Cut of Endgame?
      
      > But, DM told both Richie (in a Euro scene in The Darkness) & Anne
      > (Obsession) straight out that he'd never been married.  OK-he might have
      > lied to Anne because she was generally meddlesome & looked like a
      chipmunk,
      > but WHY would DM have lied to Richie, particularly in that touching &
      > clearly heart-felt scene?
      
      
      I don't think he lied, but a ceremony, reception, and one night of sex
      doesn't make a marriage.  It was one moment in 400 years that went bad, and
      it didn't count as a real marriage.  And probably not something he'd want to
      explain.
      
      
      > And, the whole tragically-never-married vibe ran through the series very
      > strongly.  Is there anyone who, after watching 119 eps of HL:TS but before
      > seeing Endgame, who would have said there was any real possibility DM had
      > ever married?
      
      
      Even 119 eps doesn't tell us everything that happened during Duncan's entire
      lifespan.
      
      
      > The most irksome thing is that it wasn't _necessary_ to the movie's
      > plot that DM actually marry Her Overlippedness. In fact, it would have
      been
      > much more in character (for the DM we knew in the series) for DM to have
      > told his beloved about _his_ immortality _before_ the marriage, so she
      could
      > make a rational decision about how her life would be.
      
      The key to your statement here is "for the DM we knew in the series".
      Duncan changed a lot over the years, and by the time he was with Tessa he
      had grown, learned from his mistakes, become much wiser.  He handled these
      things better.  When he first knew Kate he was young & inexperienced at
      relationships and life in general.
      
      Becky
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 17 Apr 2003 to 18 Apr 2003 (#2003-60)
      **************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 18 Apr 2003 to 19 Apr 2003 (#2003-61)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 15 Apr 2003 to 17 Apr 2003 (#2003-59)"