HIGHLA-L Digest - 31 May 2002 to 1 Jun 2002 (#2002-68)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Sat, 1 Jun 2002 22:00:03 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 1 Jun 2002 to 2 Jun 2002 (#2002-69)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 30 May 2002 to 31 May 2002 (#2002-67)"

      --------
      There are 3 messages totalling 94 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. giant frog suits.... (3)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 1 Jun 2002 15:27:30 -0400
      From:    SenseiRob@aol.com
      Subject: Re: giant frog suits....
      
      > In Return to Halloween Town, PW plays, well...a giant frog.
      
      And Debbie Reynolds is a sweet grandmother witch. Typecasting for both of them?
      
      > Okay...actually he's a bunch of  frogs (from the world's oldest man
      > to an ancient pile of frogs?).
      
      There is that myth about the guy who wanted to live forever, had his wish granted, but he eventually shriveled away into a lizard - so there's a precedent, you know.
      
      > He's a...oh...crap...what's the word?
      > One of those magical creatures that are made from earthly elements.
      > Golum? (No, not the guy from LOTR...)
      
      Golem. Sounds about the same. A manlike magickal construct imbued with life, more or less.
      
      > Anyway, in one scene, they're at a costume party and there he is, the
      > man himself, dressed in a giant frog suit, boogeying the night away.
      
      The Chicken Dance? Or the Loco-motion? (I thought that, in Halloween town, professional courtesy would require he leave the Boogey-ing to the Monster of the same name) (But he has the nose for it)
      
      > I would have shuddered in embarrassment, but I was too busy laughing.
      >
      > Maybe you had to be there?
      
      Could be worse - he could have been wearing a fern helmet. And holding a fork. And a potato wand.
      
      > Liser
      > (it was the funniest thing I'd seen in a very long time)(though that
      > probably makes me a bad fan)(and then I said "what the hell?" and
      > threw another newbie on the fire...)
      
      There's no such thing as negative publicity - yeah, right.
      
      Hey, I guess it finally answers the question:
      
      If Peter were an animal, what would he be?
      
      Now we just need to figure out what kind of fruit Duncan is.
      
      -Rob
      SenseiRob@aol.com
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 1 Jun 2002 15:34:06 EDT
      From:    Dotiran@aol.com
      Subject: Re: giant frog suits....
      
      In a message dated 6/1/2002 3:29:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
      SenseiRob@aol.com writes:
      
      
      > Now we just need to figure out what kind of fruit Duncan is.
      >
      
      Watch it buddy !  *eg*
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 1 Jun 2002 14:16:27 -0700
      From:    Danni Butterfuss <dbutter@wvi.com>
      Subject: Re: giant frog suits....
      
      Sensei Rob wrote:  < snip>
      
      >
      >Golem. Sounds about the same. A manlike magickal construct imbued with life, more or less.
      >
      
      
      More to it than that. is from the Kobala (sp?)   Must be formed from
      dirt and have magikal symbols drawn on golem to bring to live.  Acts
      mainly as a protector to the one who made Golem and brought it to life.
      Symbols must be rubbed out  to ' kill' golem and dirt must be scattered
      to the wind.
      
      BB,
      Danni
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 31 May 2002 to 1 Jun 2002 (#2002-68)
      *************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 1 Jun 2002 to 2 Jun 2002 (#2002-69)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 30 May 2002 to 31 May 2002 (#2002-67)"