HIGHLA-L Digest - 12 May 2002 to 13 May 2002 (#2002-61)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Mon, 13 May 2002 22:00:01 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 13 May 2002 to 14 May 2002 (#2002-62)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 May 2002 to 12 May 2002 (#2002-60)"

      --------
      There are 4 messages totalling 171 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Prices for Seasons on DVD? (3)
        2. From TGFKAZKLEE
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 12 May 2002 19:27:04 -0700
      From:    Jen <data@cyberg8t.com>
      Subject: Re: Prices for Seasons on DVD?
      
      PWFan16@aol.com wrote:
      >
      > I would LOVE to buy them but that is just way to much.  I could see if there were tons of bloopers and interviews etc.
      >
      > Also it would be great if you could buy some separate.  I might not want a whole season but I would go nuts buying DVDs with a few eps on it.
      >
      > JMO
      >
      > Lora
      
      
      Ehh, not really.  I was reading the ad that I had today and you get Watcher chronicle
      profiles for the characters and swords, the behind the scenes bit, and I think that was
      it.  I'll have to pay roughly 140 dollars because I'm in Calfornia.  We get to pay 8%
      sales tax. *rolls her eyes*  It's REALLY not worth it, IMO.  You don't even get the
      extras that came with the tapes.  It's just a massive waste of money.
      
      Jen
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 13 May 2002 07:59:41 -0500
      From:    Ace Miracle <ke731458@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu>
      Subject: Re: Prices for Seasons on DVD?
      
      
      One person said:
      > > merchandise. (Whatever happened with that?)  First season (the only one
      > > right now) on DVD is 129.95.  All seasons on video is 99.95 each.
      
      And on Sun, 12 May 2002 PWFan16@aol.com wrote:
      > that is just WAY to high unless there are TONS and I mean TONS of Extras
      
      The X-Files DVD sets are extremely high-priced. Even at Walmart it was
      about $115. Now, those may have TONS of extras, but I don't know if it's
      enough to justify $115.
      
      I may eventually get s5 (of HL, not XF) on DVD, just because it's the only
      one I don't have on video. As zk ::waves:: was saying, there are some eps
      that I'll probably never watch again, so I can't really justify shelling
      out the cash. Still love the show, still have good friends from fandom.
      Dug out a bunch of tapes a few weekends ago--had a Methos craving. ;)
      
      And is it just me, or does Hugh Grant and his new haircut make him look
      a little more like Peter?
      
              --Miracle (see new address? darn UCF, making me give up the userID
      I've had for the last 6 years.) (I was getting rather attached...)
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      "Remember that a walk through the ocean of most souls would scarcely get
       your feet wet."  --"Deteriorata"
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Minor Major Miracle: Time Lady, Jedi Knight, Occasional Grad Student
      179 Days 'til the Comps. http://miraclescomps.blogspot.com
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 13 May 2002 11:19:20 -0400
      From:    Lynn <lloschin@sprynet.com>
      Subject: Re: Prices for Seasons on DVD?
      
      From: "Jen" <data@cyberg8t.com>
      
      >  It's REALLY not worth it, IMO.  You don't even > get the extras that came with the tapes.  It's > just a massive waste of money.
      
      And I completely disagree.  If you are interested in seeing the episodes in crystal clear visual format with remastered 5.1 sound, it is very much worth it and not at all a waste of money.  Unlike tapes, the quality doesn't degrade every time you play them, either.
      
      To me, that's definitely worth a few extra dollars.
      
      Lynn
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 13 May 2002 20:53:53 -0400
      From:    SenseiRob@aol.com
      Subject: Re: From TGFKAZKLEE
      
      >Subject: From TGFKAZKLEE
      >
      >Hello, Highla-L, I'm new here.
      
      Wait, wait, I'm still working on the acronym! Aaah. Took a few moments for the questionably named TSFKAR.
      
      >::::: falls off porch giggling :::::
      
      :::scrambles for the brush and the plaid-colored paint:::
      
      >Actually, I got high-speed internet access. :::: preen ::::  If
      >anyone has me bookmarked as zklee@patriot.net, or even
      >zklee@huskynet, would you please bookmark me as
      >kzimmerman3@cox.net?
      
      Bookmark you? Sounds uncomfortable, or at least, embarassing.
      
      >OBHLR:
      >
      >Has anyone done any thinking about the nature of the Great
      >Highlander Obsession of the 90's?  I know I haven't been that
      >hooked on anything since - oh - the Beatles in about 1965? ::::
      >thumping cane ::::
      
      Haven't quite caught the same flavor in fandom since then.
      
      >I haven't watched HL for a very long time - it's kind of like
      >books that I read until they're memorized.  I'm always re-reading
      >books in my mind.  I remember one book that I read to pieces in
      >the 70's when I found it:  Edna Ferber's "Saratoga Trunk".  I'd
      >watched that spectacular train wreck scene as a kid (Gary Cooper
      >and Ingrid Bergman starred), and I loved the movie and loved the
      >book even more.
      >
      >Highlander is the same way.  Right now the scene going through my
      >mind, for some reason (I'm thirsty?) is Daniel Da - er Duncan
      >running, shirtless and in slo-mo, across a pond in Mountain Men
      >("...nekkid blade to nekkid blade...").
      
      Hey! No slash! <vbeg>
      
      And besides, I know you're actually obsessing over the whole Carl thing.
      
      >I don't think I'll ever watch some of the episodes.  'The
      >Darkness" is just too sad, and I've never cared that much about
      >the S2 Yung Fool episodes.  But there are some that are just
      >magical, and I suspect I'll be able to pull them out soon and
      >watch them.
      
      I'm strange for a (previously?) obsessed fan. There are (*gasp!*) some episodes I've honestly never watched, even once. Sacrilege... or good taste?
      
      >The memories, though- there's not a day that goes by that I don't
      >have some great and often hysterically funny memory of HL culture
      >at its best.
      
      Keep laughing out loud like that and the men in the funny white coats will get you. ("But he said WD40!")
      
      >HL culture, believe it or not, made a great
      >difference in my life and certainly kicked me out of my hermit's
      >cave (right next to "Was Carl T. Hermit and Immortal?")  Just
      >thinking about the parade and the Deceased Equine Derby in
      >Cybercon I can still make me giggle ("Oh, the humanity!").
      
      See? I told you. I know all about you and the Carl thing.
      
      >I think what prompted this today was looking at the cow mobile
      >from my old house and wondering where to hang it. :)
      
      Get that thing twirling fast enough, and it's just like Kansas in the springtime... flying cows and all.
      
      It's as close as we'll ever get to flying immies.
      
      >I LOVE YOU GUYS!!!!
      
      ::avoids a punch in the arm:: Hey! Watch it... after the last one, you'd think people'd learn.
      
      SenseiRob@aol.com
      "It's a foil, Clark. Every good hero needs one." Lex Luthor, Smallville
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 12 May 2002 to 13 May 2002 (#2002-61)
      **************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 13 May 2002 to 14 May 2002 (#2002-62)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 10 May 2002 to 12 May 2002 (#2002-60)"