HIGHLA-L Digest - 18 Aug 2001 to 20 Aug 2001 (#2001-242)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@LISTS.PSU.EDU)
      Mon, 20 Aug 2001 22:00:01 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 20 Aug 2001 to 21 Aug 2001 (#2001-243)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 17 Aug 2001 to 18 Aug 2001 (#2001-241)"

      --------
      There are 6 messages totalling 190 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Review: Wisdom for Con PoRA(tm) (2)
        2. another Raven question (4)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:18:12 -0400
      From:    Trilby <trilby23@bellsouth.net>
      Subject: Review: Wisdom for Con PoRA(tm)
      
      OK, I'm checking all the great advice from the collective wisdom of the
      experienced Con-goers, making a list of what I need for Reunion:
      
      Comfortable shoes (Sandy)
      
      Lots of water (Debra, Erin, ZK)
      
      Know where the restrooms are (Debra, Erin, ZK)
      
      Rest up in advance (Jen, ZK)
      
      More film than I think I'll need (Pat)
      
      Simple clothes: Jeans, tee-shirts, a sweater just in case (Mary, ZK)
      
      A note pad (Mary, Jenni, Tammy)
      
      A big ol' bag (Mary, ZK)
      
      Non-perishable, non-bug-attracting food, preferably something relatively
      healthy (ZK, Lynn)
      
      Aspirin/meds (ZK)
      
      And most important of all:  A positive attitude, a smile and expectations
      of much fun and friendship (Sandy, Mary, ZK, Pat,)
      
      Thanks, everyone, and I'm looking forward to meeting you!!
      
      
      
      -------------------- Trilby
      Live long and prosper.  May the Force be with you.
      Remember that the truth is out there ...
      And no matter where you go ... there you are ...
      But in the end there can be only one.
      Oh, boy.
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:19:55 EDT
      From:    Highlandmg@aol.com
      Subject: Re: Review: Wisdom for Con PoRA(tm)
      
      opps one more thing
      
      Batteries   (camera)  you would be very surprised how much they charge.
      
      
      Mary
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:52:02 -0600
      From:    Barbara Osgood Designs <hairbows@northerntel.net>
      Subject: another Raven question
      
      On today's Sci-Fi channel episode, the storyline revolved around the immie
      Morgan whose son was killed in 1897 and he has been out for vengeance ever
      since.  Now, I missed about the first 15 minutes, but I was wondering about
      this "son" business.  Did they say something about him adopting a son early
      in the episode, or is this supposed to be his biological son?
      
      Thanks,
      
      Barbara
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 19 Aug 2001 22:59:30 -0500
      From:    Jen <data@cyberg8t.com>
      Subject: Re: another Raven question
      
      I don't remember if it was ever said.
      
      Jen
      
      Barbara Osgood Designs wrote:
      >
      > On today's Sci-Fi channel episode, the storyline revolved around the immie
      > Morgan whose son was killed in 1897 and he has been out for vengeance ever
      > since.  Now, I missed about the first 15 minutes, but I was wondering about
      > this "son" business.  Did they say something about him adopting a son early
      > in the episode, or is this supposed to be his biological son?
      >
      > Thanks,
      >
      > Barbara
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:53:04 -1000
      From:    Geiger <geiger@maui.net>
      Subject: Re: another Raven question
      
      Barbara--
      
      > On today's Sci-Fi channel episode, the storyline revolved around the immie
      > Morgan whose son was killed in 1897 and he has been out for vengeance ever
      > since.  Now, I missed about the first 15 minutes, but I was wondering
      about
      > this "son" business.  Did they say something about him adopting a son
      early
      > in the episode, or is this supposed to be his biological son?
      
      Someplace in the ep, Morgan mentions he adopted the boy when he was 5 years
      old.
      
      But, really, there was so much else screwed up in that ep, big & small....
      An Immie killing a mortal on HG, an observable light show when there's no
      Immie close enough to take the Q, the store being called _Morgan_ & Son
      rather than Kenworthy & Son, obviously re-used footage, Amanda being all
      sweetness & light in the FB w/ no ulterior motive, a ridiculous plate-glass
      BHg.  Nicky brandishes his silly gun no less than 6 times.  Bert sports a
      bandaged wrist early on for no reason; Panzer's hint it would be removed to
      reveal a Watcher tattoo never came true.  This was one of the worst of
      Raven's 22 eps.
      
      Nina
      geiger@maui.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:27:45 -0700
      From:    Stephen Bryce <sibryce@yahoo.com>
      Subject: Re: another Raven question
      
      > an observable light show when there's no
      > Immie close enough to take the Q
      
      That's funny, because a friend of mine said that the
      same sort of thing had happened in the "Hunters"
      episode of the original series (which I've never
      seen).  Then again, he also said that Jim Byrnes also
      guest starred in that episode, which I can't confirm
      so far.
      
      > Nicky brandishes his silly gun no less than 6
      > times.
      
      He IS a freshly ex-cop and now a security agent.  What
      did you expect him to do?
      
      > Bert sports a bandaged wrist early on for no reason;
      > Panzer's hint it would be removed to reveal a
      Watcher > tattoo never came true.
      
      That's open for speculation.  It is possible that the
      actor playing Bert had really hurt his wrist at some
      point and it just wasn't covered up well.  On the
      other hand, perhaps footage was filmed that would have
      shown the Watcher tatoo, but was cut out for some
      reason.  Then the bandage was just a casualty of
      sloppy editing, like some of Michael Myers' behaviour
      in the end of "Halloween: H20".
      
      Stephen Bryce
      Author, "Highlander: The Legacy"
      http://www.geocities.com/sibryce/htl/index.htm
      
      =====
      
      
      __________________________________________________
      Do You Yahoo!?
      Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
      http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 18 Aug 2001 to 20 Aug 2001 (#2001-242)
      ***************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 20 Aug 2001 to 21 Aug 2001 (#2001-243)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 17 Aug 2001 to 18 Aug 2001 (#2001-241)"