HIGHLA-L Digest - 28 Apr 2001 to 29 Apr 2001 (#2001-138)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@LISTS.PSU.EDU)
      Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:00:01 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 29 Apr 2001 to 30 Apr 2001 (#2001-139)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 27 Apr 2001 to 28 Apr 2001 (#2001-137)"

      --------
      There are 3 messages totalling 109 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. whappings, trappings, misspellings
        2. literacy (2)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:10:01 -0500
      From:    Bridget Mintz Testa <btesta@hypercon.com>
      Subject: whappings, trappings, misspellings
      
      >Debbie wrote:
      >>... I encourage everyone here to look to the message in each post on
      >>this list and not at the 'trappings' - misspellings, grammar, or
      >>sentence structure.
      
      Then Marina wrote:
      
      >Of course, this not not apply to misspellings of "Richie".
      >People who misspell Richie will be whapped.
      >
      >(Except for ZK, who *likes* being whapped and therefore is never
      >indulged.)
      
      
      And then Terry Howard wrote:
      >The Conner McCloud Boston Duel Reenactment.
      
      AHEM.
      
      That's Connor MacLeod.  Consider yourself severely whapped, Terry.
      
      Bridget
      --
      Bridget Mintz Testa
      btesta@hypercon.com
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:21:38 -0500
      From:    Bridget Mintz Testa <btesta@hypercon.com>
      Subject: literacy
      
      Ellen writes:
      
      >That's what I'm talking about!  Literate!
      >
      >Well, maybe not Chaucer or Thomas Hardy and that lot but HEY!  It's the
      >modern age....TV rules.  But I still contend that's at least clever, if not
      >literate.  I love it.
      
      
      Please.  I'm reading Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales" right now (in a
      modern prose version), having recently finished reading Boccaccio's
      "Decameron."  Most of their tales are about getting laid, usually by
      a young wife and her lover cuckolding a foolish or otherwise
      deserving-of-being-cuckolded husband.  Now what's so literate about
      that?  Sex sells, whether it's the 20th century or the 14th,
      apparently.
      
      Obligatory Highlander reference:  Connor attended university in the
      early 20th century and received a degree in Latin.  We can therefore
      take it for granted that he is a pretty literate guy who undoubtedly
      read old Martial's epigrams, such as:
      
      Diaulus, recently physician,
      Has set up now as a mortician:
      No change, though, in the clients' condition.
      
      
      Literacy rocks.
      
      Bridget
      --
      Bridget Mintz Testa
      btesta@hypercon.com
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Sun, 29 Apr 2001 10:32:00 EDT
      From:    EllnT@aol.com
      Subject: Re: literacy
      
      In a message dated 4/28/01 11:19:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
      btesta@hypercon.com writes:
      
      Please.  I'm reading Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales" right now (in a
      modern prose version), having recently finished reading Boccaccio's
      "Decameron."  Most of their tales are about getting laid, usually by
      a young wife and her lover cuckolding a foolish or otherwise
      deserving-of-being-cuckolded husband.  Now what's so literate about
      that?
      
      I didn't mean to indicate that the subject matter was always worthy only that
      it was presented in a literate way....?  (C:
      <<
       Diaulus, recently physician,
       Has set up now as a mortician:
       No change, though, in the clients' condition.
      
      
       Literacy rocks.
        >>
      Too funny!!
      
      Ellen
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 28 Apr 2001 to 29 Apr 2001 (#2001-138)
      ***************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 29 Apr 2001 to 30 Apr 2001 (#2001-139)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 27 Apr 2001 to 28 Apr 2001 (#2001-137)"