HIGHLA-L Digest - 23 Apr 2001 to 24 Apr 2001 (#2001-133)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@LISTS.PSU.EDU)
      Tue, 24 Apr 2001 22:00:01 -0400

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 24 Apr 2001 to 25 Apr 2001 (#2001-134)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 22 Apr 2001 to 23 Apr 2001 (#2001-132)"

      --------
      There are 4 messages totalling 208 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. NO SPOILERS; HL Endgame on AT&T Digital Cable Pay Per View (3)
        2. SPOILERS; HL Endgame on AT&T Digital Cable Pay Per View
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:15:04 EDT
      From:    Billie Lee <McCelt2000@aol.com>
      Subject: Re: NO SPOILERS; HL Endgame on AT&T Digital Cable Pay Per View
      
      In a message dated 4/23/01 11:11:49 PM !!!First Boot!!!, gerry@alanguilan.com
      writes:
      
      > Not me, since it wasn't even in the final DVD cut. It was in one of the
      >  hidden clips scattered throughout the 2 discs showing some of the goofs
      >  they had while filming. Another one I remember was one shot where you see
      >  Connor's checkered white and blue boxer shorts in one of the action
      scenes. :
      > )
      >
      Hey there,
      
      I thought the boxers had polka dots?????????? <GGG>
      
      That was the right answer to the question in the game on the second DVD,
      anyhow, and that's what I thought I saw when I found the secret clip......
      
      Forever Peace,
      
      Billie-Lee
      mccelt2000@aol.com
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:43:31 -0500
      From:    Kamil <kamil@mmcable.com>
      Subject: Re: SPOILERS; HL Endgame on AT&T Digital Cable Pay Per View
      
      <Nina>
      : SPOILERS NOW
      : P
      : O
      : I
      : L
      : E
      : R
      : S
      :
      : S
      : P
      : O
      : I
      : l
      : E
      : R
      : S
      :
      : S
      : P
      : O
      : I
      : L
      : E
      : R
      : S
      Since DPP had plenty of time & no one forcing them
      : into bad choices as to the PCut, THESE goofs are
      especially irksome &
      : unforgivable.
      
      Yeah, I feel that way too. If they were going to do their
      own version in the first place, why in God's name didn't
      they try and *at least* make it error free? Surely they had
      the time, since the release date was their choice, so what
      was up with releasing a version with at least the same
      number of goofs, if not more, as the rush job? Granted, they
      fixed the HG goof, and thereby set in stone the notion that
      all Watchers are brain-dead, but that was pretty much a
      given anyway... <g>
      :
      :
      : I didn't notice that.  (Though the ending doesn't work for
      me in any
      : version.)
      
      I'm wondering now if it's on the DVD version, or if it was
      left in somehow (oh, gee, another accident) in the version
      that was earmarked to be converted for pan and scan -- or
      whatever they call that process. <g> Gerry (?) said it's one
      of the 'hidden' clips on the DVD, not part of the actual
      fight. In the VHS version (and how many versions of Endgame
      would *that* make?)(and are there any other differences?)
      it's there: a clear, full face shot of someone who isn't
      Duncan or Kell. Or AP or BP, for that matter. <g>
      
      I haven't seen the DVD, either disk, and after renting the
      VHS from Blockbuster I was more than content to wait for a
      taped copy of same from a friend. Who may or may not get
      around to it this year. <g> I have less than no interest in
      paying money for that version -- especially since I've got
      the theatrical now.
      
      The only things I really liked, and wished had been in the
      theatrical, were the added footage in the Kell fight (not to
      include the mirror!Duncan moment <g>) and Methos giving
      Duncan his sword back. They can keep the extra Rachel stuff;
      I much preferred the spookiness of her finding her picture
      skewered on a sword to worrying why someone who worked in
      that loft was tippy toeing around, looking scared out of her
      gourd, for no good reason. And the chatter in the loft bored
      me senseless (like I cared about Faith's supposed fashion
      sense?)(for a haute couture designer, they surely dressed
      her like last year's news -- and don't get me started on the
      acolytes' attire -- or were they a posse? A gaggle?
      
      Brothers? <g,d,r>
      
      Ah. And my most favorite add-on. Kell and Faith supposedly
      insulting each other. "Fuck you." "I've already had you."
      "Not really." Show of hands? Anyone out there who *hasn't*
      used that, or some close variation thereof, at some point in
      their high school or college days? Thought so. Anyone used
      it since they grew up a tad? <weg> First, shouldn't that
      have been set *after* she had been with Duncan, not before?
      Considering Kell's delicate sniff of the air in her vicinity
      (ick), followed by the 'you've been with him' comment. Or
      was that a generic 'him'? She certainly *looked* like the
      last cheap hooker in NYC, so hey, maybe it was one of her
      other boys. <g>
      
      It was nice they fixed the disappearing coat thing & showed
      : how the men got from bottom to top during the fight, but
      WHY would they
      : reuse footage in such an obvious way?  Especially, when
      they had all the
      : time in the world to actually sit & WATCH what they'd
      patched together!
      
      Shrug. Beats me.
      
      Kamil
      *******
      "Natives who beat drums to drive off evil spirits are
      objects of scorn to smart Americans who blow horns to break
      up traffic jams."
                                                                 -
      Mary Ellen Kelly
      *******
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:15:34 +0800
      From:    Gerry Alanguilan <gerry@alanguilan.com>
      Subject: Re: NO SPOILERS; HL Endgame on AT&T Digital Cable Pay Per View
      
      >
      >I thought the boxers had polka dots?????????? <GGG>
      
      Ha! ha! You're right, of course. I suddenly remembered. That makes it even
      more hilarious then. :)
      
      Gerry
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:23:53 -1000
      From:    Geiger <geiger@maui.net>
      Subject: Re: NO SPOILERS; HL Endgame on AT&T Digital Cable Pay Per View
      
      me before--
      > > Wonder which version will end up on
      > > the regular channels--theater version or Producers' Cut?
      
      Lynn--
      > Neither exactly.  Because of the short length of the theater version,
      > material will have to be added back to the broadcast TV version to
      > make it the right length.  SNIP  And, of course, they have to
      > edit out the violent shots that can't be used on regular TV (and the
      > one scene with nudity).
      
      I realize all of that.  But, it should still be clear which version--theater
      or PCut--is the basis for what shows up later, ad nauseum, on regular TV.
      
      Lynn--
      > (along with the airplane version, if there's going to
      > be one)
      
      Um, I doubt it for HL:EG.  (Did ANYONE catch HL:EG in mid-air???)  Sci-fi
      movies aren't usually shown in the friendly skies, & I don't see any reason
      this particular one would have been a rarity.
      
      > and will include always-bad
      > television ADR to replace the dirty words.
      
      Can't be any worse that the non-AP dubbing for DM in the new final scene of
      the PCut.  (The only way THAT could have been worse was if they'd used a
      woman--w/ a Southern accent & a bad head cold.)
      
      Nina
      geiger@maui.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 23 Apr 2001 to 24 Apr 2001 (#2001-133)
      ***************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 24 Apr 2001 to 25 Apr 2001 (#2001-134)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 22 Apr 2001 to 23 Apr 2001 (#2001-132)"